The effects of entrepreneurship on income inequality in developed countries: in search of mechanisms

Abstract This paper contributes to exploring mechanisms through which entrepreneurship can reduce income inequality in developed countries. During the 2000s, higher-quality (opportunity-driven, growth-oriented, or innovative) entrepreneurship reduced inequality by diminishing the income share of the upper tail. A possible mechanism is Schumpeterian creative destruction. Entrepreneurs may have challenged the market power of incumbent firms, reducing their markups and the remuneration of their owners and managers. Higher-quality entrepreneurship additionally increased the income share at the lower tail. A possible mechanism is job creation. Entrepreneurs may have offered poor, low-skilled workers additional employment opportunities. During the 2010s, the effect of opportunity entrepreneurship on income inequality vanished, however. It neither reduced the top nor increased the bottom income shares. This hints toward a declining role of both creative destruction and job creation. Necessity entrepreneurship has not affected income inequality during the entire period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirica
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-026-09694-2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The effects of entrepreneurship on income inequality in developed countries: in search of mechanisms

Alina Sorgner, Eckhardt Bode, Lena Fiedler
Empirica
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
article

The effects of entrepreneurship on income inequality in developed countries: in search of mechanisms

Alina Sorgner, Eckhardt Bode, Lena Fiedler
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper contributes to exploring mechanisms through which entrepreneurship can reduce income inequality in developed countries. During the 2000s, higher-quality (opportunity-driven, growth-oriented, or innovative) entrepreneurship reduced inequality by diminishing the income share of the upper tail. A possible mechanism is Schumpeterian creative destruction. Entrepreneurs may have challenged the market power of incumbent firms, reducing their markups and the remuneration of their owners and managers. Higher-quality entrepreneurship additionally increased the income share at the lower tail. A possible mechanism is job creation. Entrepreneurs may have offered poor, low-skilled workers additional employment opportunities. During the 2010s, the effect of opportunity entrepreneurship on income inequality vanished, however. It neither reduced the top nor increased the bottom income shares. This hints toward a declining role of both creative destruction and job creation. Necessity entrepreneurship has not affected income inequality during the entire period.

Empirica
Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU), Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LU), John Cabot University (IT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The effects of entrepreneurship on income inequality in developed countries: in search of mechanisms — Alina Sorgner, Eckhardt Bode, et al. · Empirica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS