Examining Water Infrastructure System Efficiency: A Unit-Based Analysis of Total Productivity, Partial Productivity, and Infrastructure Leakage Index in California and Georgia

Critical infrastructure systems are increasingly challenged by climate variability, aging assets, population growth, and operational interdependencies that threaten long-term system resilience and sustainability. Water utilities, as complex socio-technical infrastructure systems, require integrated performance assessment approaches that move beyond traditional component-level efficiency metrics toward holistic, system-oriented decision support frameworks. This study evaluates the relationship between unit-based productivity measures and infrastructure leakage performance across municipal water utilities in California (CA) and Georgia (GA) using data from the American Water Works Association (AWWA). The research applies a systems-based analytical framework to investigate how operational productivity, infrastructure leakage, and data quality interact within complex utility environments. By removing customer retail pricing effects from productivity calculations, the study introduces a unit-based methodology that better isolates operational system performance and enables more objective cross-utility comparisons. Statistical analyses, including Interquartile Range filtering and revised Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI) calculations, reveal several significant positive relationships between productivity and water loss, challenging the conventional assumption that higher productivity inherently corresponds to greater infrastructure efficiency and resilience. The findings further demonstrate how inconsistencies in assumed loss variables and infrastructure reporting can distort system-level performance assessments and negatively influence infrastructure investment and management decisions. From a systems perspective, the results highlight the importance of integrated resilience analytics, data accuracy, adaptive management, and infrastructure governance in supporting sustainable utility operations. The findings contribute to the growing body of research on critical infrastructure resilience, data-driven infrastructure management, and decision-support methodologies for complex interdependent systems. This work provides practical insights for utility managers, policymakers, and infrastructure planners seeking to improve resilience, reduce non-revenue water loss, optimize infrastructure investments, and strengthen long-term sustainability outcomes within climate-affected and resource-constrained urban environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14101202
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Examining Water Infrastructure System Efficiency: A Unit-Based Analysis of Total Productivity, Partial Productivity, and Infrastructure Leakage Index in California and Georgia

Jennifer Cross, Mario G. Beruvides, Keith H. Horbatuck
Systems
Water Systems and Optimization
article

Examining Water Infrastructure System Efficiency: A Unit-Based Analysis of Total Productivity, Partial Productivity, and Infrastructure Leakage Index in California and Georgia

Jennifer Cross, Mario G. Beruvides, Keith H. Horbatuck
article en

Abstract

Critical infrastructure systems are increasingly challenged by climate variability, aging assets, population growth, and operational interdependencies that threaten long-term system resilience and sustainability. Water utilities, as complex socio-technical infrastructure systems, require integrated performance assessment approaches that move beyond traditional component-level efficiency metrics toward holistic, system-oriented decision support frameworks. This study evaluates the relationship between unit-based productivity measures and infrastructure leakage performance across municipal water utilities in California (CA) and Georgia (GA) using data from the American Water Works Association (AWWA). The research applies a systems-based analytical framework to investigate how operational productivity, infrastructure leakage, and data quality interact within complex utility environments. By removing customer retail pricing effects from productivity calculations, the study introduces a unit-based methodology that better isolates operational system performance and enables more objective cross-utility comparisons. Statistical analyses, including Interquartile Range filtering and revised Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI) calculations, reveal several significant positive relationships between productivity and water loss, challenging the conventional assumption that higher productivity inherently corresponds to greater infrastructure efficiency and resilience. The findings further demonstrate how inconsistencies in assumed loss variables and infrastructure reporting can distort system-level performance assessments and negatively influence infrastructure investment and management decisions. From a systems perspective, the results highlight the importance of integrated resilience analytics, data accuracy, adaptive management, and infrastructure governance in supporting sustainable utility operations. The findings contribute to the growing body of research on critical infrastructure resilience, data-driven infrastructure management, and decision-support methodologies for complex interdependent systems. This work provides practical insights for utility managers, policymakers, and infrastructure planners seeking to improve resilience, reduce non-revenue water loss, optimize infrastructure investments, and strengthen long-term sustainability outcomes within climate-affected and resource-constrained urban environments.

SystemsVol. 14(10)
Texas Tech University (US), University of Miami (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Water Systems and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.