Attitudes toward and knowledge of the potential medicinal properties of cannabis among incoming medical students: a cross-sectional survey

Abstract Background Although medical cannabis (MC) is legal in most US states, < 10% of medical schools’ curricula include MC content, and prior research suggests medical students hold variable knowledge and attitudes. This study assessed incoming medical students' knowledge of MC, relationships between knowledge and personal attitudes, the role of personal experience, and support for curricular change. Methods Incoming students at one US medical school ( N = 250, 304 invited, 82% response rate) completed a baseline survey during orientation. Knowledge was assessed across three domains: MC adverse effects (21 items), MC indications (23 items), and THC vs. CBD differences (10 items). Attitudes were measured using a 16-item cannabis survey on a 5-point Likert scale. Spearman's rho correlations, Mann–Whitney U tests, and linear regression examined associations between knowledge, attitudes, and personal experience. Results Students’ accuracy was low on all knowledge assessments: adverse effects (46.1%), indications (53.7%), and THC vs. CBD (45.4%). Yet, 76% agreed cannabis helps patients with chronic, debilitating conditions, and 58.4% supported federal rescheduling. Most students felt unprepared to answer patient questions (61.2%) or counsel patients (67.2%) about MC. Students who knew someone using MC (34.4%) demonstrated greater knowledge of indications ( U = 5047.50, p < 0.001) and THC vs. CBD ( U = 5519.5, p = 0.005). Most supported adding MC content to medical school curricula (80.4%) and residency training (73.6%). Conclusions Incoming medical students hold largely favorable attitudes toward MC that are incongruent with their knowledge deficits, and informal personal exposure—rather than formal education—shapes their understanding. These findings, combined with students' self-reported unpreparedness and support for curricular reform, underscore the need for standardized, evidence-based MC education across medical training.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cannabis Research
Published
2026-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-026-00513-w
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Attitudes toward and knowledge of the potential medicinal properties of cannabis among incoming medical students: a cross-sectional survey

Eva Waineo, Mark K. Greenwald, Tabitha E.H. Moses, Abigail M Biddix et al.
Journal of Cannabis Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Attitudes toward and knowledge of the potential medicinal properties of cannabis among incoming medical students: a cross-sectional survey

Eva Waineo, Mark K. Greenwald, Tabitha E.H. Moses, Abigail M Biddix, Abbie R. S. Bauer, Stephanie Barna
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Although medical cannabis (MC) is legal in most US states, < 10% of medical schools’ curricula include MC content, and prior research suggests medical students hold variable knowledge and attitudes. This study assessed incoming medical students' knowledge of MC, relationships between knowledge and personal attitudes, the role of personal experience, and support for curricular change. Methods Incoming students at one US medical school ( N = 250, 304 invited, 82% response rate) completed a baseline survey during orientation. Knowledge was assessed across three domains: MC adverse effects (21 items), MC indications (23 items), and THC vs. CBD differences (10 items). Attitudes were measured using a 16-item cannabis survey on a 5-point Likert scale. Spearman's rho correlations, Mann–Whitney U tests, and linear regression examined associations between knowledge, attitudes, and personal experience. Results Students’ accuracy was low on all knowledge assessments: adverse effects (46.1%), indications (53.7%), and THC vs. CBD (45.4%). Yet, 76% agreed cannabis helps patients with chronic, debilitating conditions, and 58.4% supported federal rescheduling. Most students felt unprepared to answer patient questions (61.2%) or counsel patients (67.2%) about MC. Students who knew someone using MC (34.4%) demonstrated greater knowledge of indications ( U = 5047.50, p < 0.001) and THC vs. CBD ( U = 5519.5, p = 0.005). Most supported adding MC content to medical school curricula (80.4%) and residency training (73.6%). Conclusions Incoming medical students hold largely favorable attitudes toward MC that are incongruent with their knowledge deficits, and informal personal exposure—rather than formal education—shapes their understanding. These findings, combined with students' self-reported unpreparedness and support for curricular reform, underscore the need for standardized, evidence-based MC education across medical training.

Journal of Cannabis Research
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Attitudes toward and knowledge of the potential medicinal properties of cannabis among incoming medical students: a cross-sectional survey — Eva Waineo, Mark K. Greenwald, et al. · Journal of Cannabis Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS