Developing an Integrated Risk Governance Framework for Saudi Holding Companies in Support of Vision 2030

Saudi holding companies are increasingly central to portfolio investment, sectoral diversification, localization, and large-scale transformation under Vision 2030. Their governance challenge is distinctive: while risks originate within individual subsidiaries, value destruction can propagate through shared financing, brands, digital infrastructure, suppliers, executives, and strategic dependencies at the group level. This review develops an integrated risk governance framework tailored to this multi-entity context. An integrative review approach synthesizes research on enterprise risk management, board governance, organizational resilience, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, digital risk, supply-chain resilience, and Saudi corporate governance. The synthesis demonstrates that conventional subsidiary-by-subsidiary risk registers are inadequate when the parent company must understand risk concentration, contagion, correlated exposures, and strategic trade-offs across a portfolio. Effective governance therefore requires five interconnected capabilities: board-level risk direction and appetite; a group risk office capable of aggregating and challenging exposures; clearly retained subsidiary ownership of operational risks; independent assurance; and a continuous decision loop linking risk information to capital allocation, strategy, and learning. Saudi evidence further indicates that board structure, audit and sustainability mechanisms, institutional quality, disclosure, and investor expectations influence the credibility of governance arrangements. The proposed framework aligns these findings with Vision 2030 priorities by positioning risk governance as an infrastructure for disciplined growth rather than mere compliance. It provides a research agenda and practical design principles for holding-company boards, group chief risk officers, subsidiary leaders, regulators, and investors seeking resilience without sacrificing entrepreneurial autonomy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev10i3-1723133
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Developing an Integrated Risk Governance Framework for Saudi Holding Companies in Support of Vision 2030

Essam Ali Hassan Abdelaal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Developing an Integrated Risk Governance Framework for Saudi Holding Companies in Support of Vision 2030

Essam Ali Hassan Abdelaal
article en

Abstract

Saudi holding companies are increasingly central to portfolio investment, sectoral diversification, localization, and large-scale transformation under Vision 2030. Their governance challenge is distinctive: while risks originate within individual subsidiaries, value destruction can propagate through shared financing, brands, digital infrastructure, suppliers, executives, and strategic dependencies at the group level. This review develops an integrated risk governance framework tailored to this multi-entity context. An integrative review approach synthesizes research on enterprise risk management, board governance, organizational resilience, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, digital risk, supply-chain resilience, and Saudi corporate governance. The synthesis demonstrates that conventional subsidiary-by-subsidiary risk registers are inadequate when the parent company must understand risk concentration, contagion, correlated exposures, and strategic trade-offs across a portfolio. Effective governance therefore requires five interconnected capabilities: board-level risk direction and appetite; a group risk office capable of aggregating and challenging exposures; clearly retained subsidiary ownership of operational risks; independent assurance; and a continuous decision loop linking risk information to capital allocation, strategy, and learning. Saudi evidence further indicates that board structure, audit and sustainability mechanisms, institutional quality, disclosure, and investor expectations influence the credibility of governance arrangements. The proposed framework aligns these findings with Vision 2030 priorities by positioning risk governance as an infrastructure for disciplined growth rather than mere compliance. It provides a research agenda and practical design principles for holding-company boards, group chief risk officers, subsidiary leaders, regulators, and investors seeking resilience without sacrificing entrepreneurial autonomy.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 10(3)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing an Integrated Risk Governance Framework for Saudi Holding Companies in Support of Vision 2030 — Essam Ali Hassan Abdelaal · Iconic Research and Engineering Journals (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS