The Osiris Shaft at Giza as an Engineering System: A Temporally Neutral Feasibility Analysis from Construction to Sarcophagus Placement

This study examines the Osiris Shaft at Giza as an integrated engineering system and asks whether its documented geometry, known technological methods, and necessary construction and transport operations can be combined into a physically and operationally feasible end-to-end technological process, from construction of the complex to final placement of the third-level basalt sarcophagus. The analysis is temporally neutral: it does not assume in advance the technology of a particular historical period. Instead, it evaluates the compatibility of geometry, mechanics, material properties, workspace, human work capacity, underground environmental conditions, rigging, load transfer, motion control, and the sequential dependencies between mandatory operations. The study distinguishes the local admissibility of individual operations from the existence of a coherent system-level process and uses sequential constraint testing, including an adaptation of the Theory of Constraints, to examine surviving technological alternatives. Several locally admissible solutions are identified during the analysis, including rolling transport as an alternative to sliding. However, subsequent testing of the Shaft C → Chamber I transition shows that the remaining single-line and multi-rope support-friction architectures do not provide a physically realizable continuation under the combined geometric, mechanical, ergonomic, physiological, environmental, and control requirements of the operation. No feasible end-to-end technological process remains within the explored space of documented and physically admissible architectures. The result does not imply that no historical process existed: the complex and the sarcophagus are observed facts. Rather, the actual technological process by which the present configuration was produced remains undetermined. More generally, the study presents the Osiris Shaft as a case study in system-level feasibility assessment of reconstructed historical technological processes. Research line: Systems Feasibility Studies of Historical and Archaeological Reconstructions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22958340
Primary Topic
Water management and technologies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

The Osiris Shaft at Giza as an Engineering System: A Temporally Neutral Feasibility Analysis from Construction to Sarcophagus Placement

Vadym Semenov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Water management and technologies
preprint

The Osiris Shaft at Giza as an Engineering System: A Temporally Neutral Feasibility Analysis from Construction to Sarcophagus Placement

Vadym Semenov
preprint en

Abstract

This study examines the Osiris Shaft at Giza as an integrated engineering system and asks whether its documented geometry, known technological methods, and necessary construction and transport operations can be combined into a physically and operationally feasible end-to-end technological process, from construction of the complex to final placement of the third-level basalt sarcophagus. The analysis is temporally neutral: it does not assume in advance the technology of a particular historical period. Instead, it evaluates the compatibility of geometry, mechanics, material properties, workspace, human work capacity, underground environmental conditions, rigging, load transfer, motion control, and the sequential dependencies between mandatory operations. The study distinguishes the local admissibility of individual operations from the existence of a coherent system-level process and uses sequential constraint testing, including an adaptation of the Theory of Constraints, to examine surviving technological alternatives. Several locally admissible solutions are identified during the analysis, including rolling transport as an alternative to sliding. However, subsequent testing of the Shaft C → Chamber I transition shows that the remaining single-line and multi-rope support-friction architectures do not provide a physically realizable continuation under the combined geometric, mechanical, ergonomic, physiological, environmental, and control requirements of the operation. No feasible end-to-end technological process remains within the explored space of documented and physically admissible architectures. The result does not imply that no historical process existed: the complex and the sarcophagus are observed facts. Rather, the actual technological process by which the present configuration was produced remains undetermined. More generally, the study presents the Osiris Shaft as a case study in system-level feasibility assessment of reconstructed historical technological processes. Research line: Systems Feasibility Studies of Historical and Archaeological Reconstructions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable cities and communities
Water management and technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Osiris Shaft at Giza as an Engineering System: A Temporally Neutral Feasibility Analysis from Construction to Sarcophagus Placement — Vadym Semenov · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS