The optimal time of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection in eCura-C2 gastric cancer patients

Early gastric cancer (EGC) patients who undergo non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) require additional surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal time of additional surgery in EGC patients with an endoscopic curability C-2 (eCura-C2) indication. A retrospective study was conducted in EGC patients with an eCura-C2 indication from March 2011 to December 2019. A total of 105 patients were included. According to the time of additional surgery, they were divided into two groups: early surgery group (1–29 days, n = 72) and delayed surgery group (30–90 days, n = 33). We retrospectively compared the clinical characteristics, surgical safety, complications, and outcomes between the two groups. No statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. The early surgery group showed more intraoperative blood loss than the delayed surgery group (168.2 ± 106.9 mL vs. 126.1 ± 71.1 mL, P = 0.042). No significant differences were observed in operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of complications. Kaplan–Meier curves showed no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) and in the incidence of recurrence (time to recurrence) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of lymph node metastasis (8.3% in the early surgery group vs. 12.1% in the delayed surgery group, P = 0.539). Logistic regression analysis suggested that lymphovascular invasion was associated with lymph node metastasis in eCura-C2 patients (OR = 6.917, 95% CI: 1.741–27.479, P = 0.006). No statistically significant difference in oncological outcomes was detected between early and delayed additional surgery in this small, retrospective cohort, which was underpowered to establish equivalence. Early surgery was associated with greater intraoperative blood loss. The timing of additional surgery should be individualized based on tumor characteristics, patient condition, and patient preference, and warrants further investigation in larger prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04304-y
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The optimal time of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection in eCura-C2 gastric cancer patients

Meng Wang, Hao Chen, Wenxian Guan, Ning Wang et al.
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

The optimal time of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection in eCura-C2 gastric cancer patients

Meng Wang, Hao Chen, Wenxian Guan, Ning Wang, Longxi Li, Yucheng Wang, Yibo Huang, Xin Chen, Yuexuan Shao
article en

Abstract

Early gastric cancer (EGC) patients who undergo non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) require additional surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal time of additional surgery in EGC patients with an endoscopic curability C-2 (eCura-C2) indication. A retrospective study was conducted in EGC patients with an eCura-C2 indication from March 2011 to December 2019. A total of 105 patients were included. According to the time of additional surgery, they were divided into two groups: early surgery group (1–29 days, n = 72) and delayed surgery group (30–90 days, n = 33). We retrospectively compared the clinical characteristics, surgical safety, complications, and outcomes between the two groups. No statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. The early surgery group showed more intraoperative blood loss than the delayed surgery group (168.2 ± 106.9 mL vs. 126.1 ± 71.1 mL, P = 0.042). No significant differences were observed in operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of complications. Kaplan–Meier curves showed no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) and in the incidence of recurrence (time to recurrence) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of lymph node metastasis (8.3% in the early surgery group vs. 12.1% in the delayed surgery group, P = 0.539). Logistic regression analysis suggested that lymphovascular invasion was associated with lymph node metastasis in eCura-C2 patients (OR = 6.917, 95% CI: 1.741–27.479, P = 0.006). No statistically significant difference in oncological outcomes was detected between early and delayed additional surgery in this small, retrospective cohort, which was underpowered to establish equivalence. Early surgery was associated with greater intraoperative blood loss. The timing of additional surgery should be individualized based on tumor characteristics, patient condition, and patient preference, and warrants further investigation in larger prospective studies.

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Jiangsu University (CN), Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.