Sepsis Diagnostic Excellence: Development and Validation of a Theoretical Framework for Conceptualizing Accurate, Timely Sepsis Diagnosis

OBJECTIVES: Develop and empirically validate the Sepsis Diagnostic Excellence (SepsisDx) Theoretical Framework of multilevel factors influencing accurate, timely sepsis diagnosis. DESIGN: Observational qualitative semi-structured interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty hospitals spanning four states and two health systems within the United States were purposively selected to maximize location, system structure, and patient population representation. ANALYSIS: We conducted 41 interviews with key informants from 13 hospitals, including top managers (e.g., system leaders), mid-level managers (e.g., emergency department (ED) heads; sepsis coordinators), and patient-facing clinicians and staff (e.g., unit nurses). We developed an interview guide by integrating three extant frameworks that collectively conceptualize sepsis diagnosis as a behavior among healthcare providers that is influenced by factors at micro-, meso-, and macroorganization levels. To develop SepsisDx, we used template analysis to identify constructs that influenced accurate, timely sepsis diagnosis and rapid analysis to identify relationships among the framework’s constructs. We refined preliminary findings based on feedback from a study advisory board and interview participants. RESULTS: Interviews validated the central premise of SepsisDx—that is, sepsis diagnosis is influenced by the interaction of factors at micro-, meso-, and macrolevels. The most salient individual-level factor influencing timely sepsis diagnosis was attention (i.e., noticing, encoding, interpreting, and focusing time and effort). Attention was reduced by ambiguous clinical presentations and environmental shocks (e.g., COVID-19). Various strategies increased organization-level attention while decreasing provider-level attention (e.g., audit and feedback). Strategies’ effectiveness was moderated by hospital characteristics such as staffing. CONCLUSIONS: The SepsisDx framework clarifies which factors influence sepsis diagnosis and how these factors operate through specific mechanisms. Accurate, timely sepsis diagnosis depends on organizational attention that aligns with individual provider attention to potential sepsis diagnoses. Leaders may improve sepsis diagnosis by pursuing health system- and organization-level strategies that reflect individual-, team-, and emergency-department-level experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Explorations
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000001490
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Sepsis Diagnostic Excellence: Development and Validation of a Theoretical Framework for Conceptualizing Accurate, Timely Sepsis Diagnosis

Chadwick D. Miller, Marc A. Kowalkowski, Jessie E. King, Stephanie Parks Taylor et al.
Critical Care Explorations
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Sepsis Diagnostic Excellence: Development and Validation of a Theoretical Framework for Conceptualizing Accurate, Timely Sepsis Diagnosis

Chadwick D. Miller, Marc A. Kowalkowski, Jessie E. King, Stephanie Parks Taylor, Cheyenne R. Wagi, Stefanie S. Sebok‐Syer, Jessica A. Palakshappa, Laura S. Clark, Sarah A. Birken, Kandice L. Reilly, Sachita Shrestha
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Develop and empirically validate the Sepsis Diagnostic Excellence (SepsisDx) Theoretical Framework of multilevel factors influencing accurate, timely sepsis diagnosis. DESIGN: Observational qualitative semi-structured interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty hospitals spanning four states and two health systems within the United States were purposively selected to maximize location, system structure, and patient population representation. ANALYSIS: We conducted 41 interviews with key informants from 13 hospitals, including top managers (e.g., system leaders), mid-level managers (e.g., emergency department (ED) heads; sepsis coordinators), and patient-facing clinicians and staff (e.g., unit nurses). We developed an interview guide by integrating three extant frameworks that collectively conceptualize sepsis diagnosis as a behavior among healthcare providers that is influenced by factors at micro-, meso-, and macroorganization levels. To develop SepsisDx, we used template analysis to identify constructs that influenced accurate, timely sepsis diagnosis and rapid analysis to identify relationships among the framework’s constructs. We refined preliminary findings based on feedback from a study advisory board and interview participants. RESULTS: Interviews validated the central premise of SepsisDx—that is, sepsis diagnosis is influenced by the interaction of factors at micro-, meso-, and macrolevels. The most salient individual-level factor influencing timely sepsis diagnosis was attention (i.e., noticing, encoding, interpreting, and focusing time and effort). Attention was reduced by ambiguous clinical presentations and environmental shocks (e.g., COVID-19). Various strategies increased organization-level attention while decreasing provider-level attention (e.g., audit and feedback). Strategies’ effectiveness was moderated by hospital characteristics such as staffing. CONCLUSIONS: The SepsisDx framework clarifies which factors influence sepsis diagnosis and how these factors operate through specific mechanisms. Accurate, timely sepsis diagnosis depends on organizational attention that aligns with individual provider attention to potential sepsis diagnoses. Leaders may improve sepsis diagnosis by pursuing health system- and organization-level strategies that reflect individual-, team-, and emergency-department-level experiences.

Critical Care ExplorationsVol. 8(10)
University of Michigan (US), Wake Forest University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.