Breaking barriers: advancing strategies to foster a circular economy through additive manufacturing – a case study in the plastics industry

Abstract The manufacturing industry faces the challenge of using resources more efficiently and implementing circular practices. A promising pathway is to establish a circular economy (CE) through additive manufacturing (AM), enabling on-demand production with low material input and allowing the use of recycled materials. Despite this potential, practical barriers hinder its adoption and are insufficiently understood from a multi-stakeholder perspective. This paper combines stakeholder theory with the circular supply chain management concept in a qualitative multiple-case study to examine the perspectives and interactions of the actors involved. The findings separate the general technical adoption barriers of AM from the socioeconomic and relational barriers of circularity, which arise from power asymmetries, information asymmetries, and coordination failures among interdependent actors of differing salience. These barriers vary substantially with firms’ initial conditions, including their AM technology maturity, their engagement in closed-loop practices, and the managerial relevance they assign to circularity. The study develops five propositions based on the cross-case analysis and identifies three distinct pathways from barrier to solution for firms at different stages of circular supply chain development. Trust-based partnerships between manufacturing and recycling companies can close material loops locally, but they remain fragile amid price competition from virgin materials. Durable circularity therefore requires governance safeguards, including guaranteed-offtake contracts, verifiable production information, and consolidated reverse logistics, all supported by regulatory intervention. The study contributes to the CE and operations management literature by providing a deeper understanding of these barriers and proposing actionable measures for stakeholders to promote circularity in the specific AM domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Economics
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-026-01283-w
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Breaking barriers: advancing strategies to foster a circular economy through additive manufacturing – a case study in the plastics industry

Jacob Lohmer, Rainer Lasch, Alexander Bade, Rebecca Kißner
Journal of Business Economics
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Breaking barriers: advancing strategies to foster a circular economy through additive manufacturing – a case study in the plastics industry

Jacob Lohmer, Rainer Lasch, Alexander Bade, Rebecca Kißner
article en

Abstract

Abstract The manufacturing industry faces the challenge of using resources more efficiently and implementing circular practices. A promising pathway is to establish a circular economy (CE) through additive manufacturing (AM), enabling on-demand production with low material input and allowing the use of recycled materials. Despite this potential, practical barriers hinder its adoption and are insufficiently understood from a multi-stakeholder perspective. This paper combines stakeholder theory with the circular supply chain management concept in a qualitative multiple-case study to examine the perspectives and interactions of the actors involved. The findings separate the general technical adoption barriers of AM from the socioeconomic and relational barriers of circularity, which arise from power asymmetries, information asymmetries, and coordination failures among interdependent actors of differing salience. These barriers vary substantially with firms’ initial conditions, including their AM technology maturity, their engagement in closed-loop practices, and the managerial relevance they assign to circularity. The study develops five propositions based on the cross-case analysis and identifies three distinct pathways from barrier to solution for firms at different stages of circular supply chain development. Trust-based partnerships between manufacturing and recycling companies can close material loops locally, but they remain fragile amid price competition from virgin materials. Durable circularity therefore requires governance safeguards, including guaranteed-offtake contracts, verifiable production information, and consolidated reverse logistics, all supported by regulatory intervention. The study contributes to the CE and operations management literature by providing a deeper understanding of these barriers and proposing actionable measures for stakeholders to promote circularity in the specific AM domain.

Journal of Business Economics
Ludwigshafen University of Business and Society (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.