Exploring Practitioner Perspectives on the Exit and Reintegration of Federally Incarcerated Extremists

Recently, practitioners have expressed concern about the increasing number of clients on supervision with current or past involvement in violent extremism. There is limited evidence on the specific needs of violent extremists during reintegration and the factors associated with terrorist recidivism and re-engagement. Consequently, we know little about how applicable the policies and practices designed to reduce recidivism and facilitate reintegration are for formerly incarcerated extremists on supervised release. Our study assesses a broad range of practitioners to explore emergent policy issues related to management, interventions, resources, and training. We conducted qualitative interviews with 56 practitioners to understand how they approach cases involving violent extremism and the challenges they face. We employed thematic analysis and present our emergent themes in three thematic categories: overlapping vulnerabilities and criminogenic needs, challenges with extremist clients, and training needs. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for policy and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice Policy Review
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034261484558
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Exploring Practitioner Perspectives on the Exit and Reintegration of Federally Incarcerated Extremists

Sadaf Hashimi, Noah D. Turner, Erin M. Kearns, Isaac J. Moelter
Criminal Justice Policy Review
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Exploring Practitioner Perspectives on the Exit and Reintegration of Federally Incarcerated Extremists

Sadaf Hashimi, Noah D. Turner, Erin M. Kearns, Isaac J. Moelter
article en

Abstract

Recently, practitioners have expressed concern about the increasing number of clients on supervision with current or past involvement in violent extremism. There is limited evidence on the specific needs of violent extremists during reintegration and the factors associated with terrorist recidivism and re-engagement. Consequently, we know little about how applicable the policies and practices designed to reduce recidivism and facilitate reintegration are for formerly incarcerated extremists on supervised release. Our study assesses a broad range of practitioners to explore emergent policy issues related to management, interventions, resources, and training. We conducted qualitative interviews with 56 practitioners to understand how they approach cases involving violent extremism and the challenges they face. We employed thematic analysis and present our emergent themes in three thematic categories: overlapping vulnerabilities and criminogenic needs, challenges with extremist clients, and training needs. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for policy and practice.

Criminal Justice Policy Review
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.