Quantitative MRI of the mesoesophagus: normative values and anthropometric determinants in healthy participants

Abstract MRI-derived assessment of the mesoesophagus has not been investigated in-vivo. This study aims to establish quantitative MRI-based mesoesophageal parameters. Prospectively, monocentric, 81 healthy participants underwent 3T navigator-triggered T1w-Dixon, 35 participants axial T2w-MRI additionally. Mesoesophageal compartments were segmented and quantified: esophageal length (EL, cm), wall thickness (mm), lumen (EL Vol , cm 3 ), esophageal volume (E Vol , cm 3 ), extra-esophageal mesoesophageal volume (EEM Vol , cm 3 ), total mesoesophageal volume (TM Vol , cm 3 ), the sum of EEM Vol and E Vol , extra-esophageal fat proportion (EEM Fat , %), the ratio of fat-only-signal to the sum of fat-only- and water-only-signal. Median ± IQR, reference intervals (2.5th–97.5th percentiles), multivariable analyses assessing the effects sex, age, BMI, BSA, alongside intra- and interobserver-ICC, cross-sequence concordance, Bland–Altman analysis of T1- and T2-weighted measurements were calculated. 78 participants (60% male, median 54y) were included. EL was 27.2 cm (23.1–31.6 cm), EW 3.8 mm (3.1–5.1 mm), ELVol 0.4 cm3 (0.00-3.50 cm3), EVol 29.9 cm3 (13.4–47.8 cm3), EEMVol 8.2 cm3 (0.7–25.9 cm3), TMVol 36.7 cm3 (18.8–77.3 cm3) and EEMFat 78% (26–91%). BSA predicted EW, EVol, EEMVol and TMVol (p ≤ 0.001). Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of EL was good (ICC ≥ 0.83), with no bias. Demographic and anatomical factors influence mesoesophageal compartments with BSA predicting mesoesophageal volumes, and sex independently predicting volumes except EEM Fat , affording a reference framework for clinical assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-72998-7
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantitative MRI of the mesoesophagus: normative values and anthropometric determinants in healthy participants

Andreas Pascher, Jens Peter Hölzen, Tobias Krähling, Gesa Helen Pöhler et al.
Scientific Reports
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Quantitative MRI of the mesoesophagus: normative values and anthropometric determinants in healthy participants

Andreas Pascher, Jens Peter Hölzen, Tobias Krähling, Gesa Helen Pöhler, Michael Köhler, Marc‐David Künnemann, Sebastian Kubasch, Gala Nacul Mora, Jan Masthoff, Tabea Recker, Ellian Nottebaum, Felicitas Knieper
article en

Abstract

Abstract MRI-derived assessment of the mesoesophagus has not been investigated in-vivo. This study aims to establish quantitative MRI-based mesoesophageal parameters. Prospectively, monocentric, 81 healthy participants underwent 3T navigator-triggered T1w-Dixon, 35 participants axial T2w-MRI additionally. Mesoesophageal compartments were segmented and quantified: esophageal length (EL, cm), wall thickness (mm), lumen (EL Vol , cm 3 ), esophageal volume (E Vol , cm 3 ), extra-esophageal mesoesophageal volume (EEM Vol , cm 3 ), total mesoesophageal volume (TM Vol , cm 3 ), the sum of EEM Vol and E Vol , extra-esophageal fat proportion (EEM Fat , %), the ratio of fat-only-signal to the sum of fat-only- and water-only-signal. Median ± IQR, reference intervals (2.5th–97.5th percentiles), multivariable analyses assessing the effects sex, age, BMI, BSA, alongside intra- and interobserver-ICC, cross-sequence concordance, Bland–Altman analysis of T1- and T2-weighted measurements were calculated. 78 participants (60% male, median 54y) were included. EL was 27.2 cm (23.1–31.6 cm), EW 3.8 mm (3.1–5.1 mm), ELVol 0.4 cm3 (0.00-3.50 cm3), EVol 29.9 cm3 (13.4–47.8 cm3), EEMVol 8.2 cm3 (0.7–25.9 cm3), TMVol 36.7 cm3 (18.8–77.3 cm3) and EEMFat 78% (26–91%). BSA predicted EW, EVol, EEMVol and TMVol (p ≤ 0.001). Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of EL was good (ICC ≥ 0.83), with no bias. Demographic and anatomical factors influence mesoesophageal compartments with BSA predicting mesoesophageal volumes, and sex independently predicting volumes except EEM Fat , affording a reference framework for clinical assessment.

Scientific Reports
University Hospital Münster (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.