Toward reliable water resource assessment: Correcting bias in satellite-based rainfall and model-derived discharge in Kenya’s Central Highlands

Reliable precipitation and streamflow data are essential for hydrological modelling and water resources management, yet observational networks in many African regions remain sparse. This study evaluated five satellite precipitation products (SPPs) CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CCS, PERSIANN-PDIR, TAMSAT, and MSWEP and modelled stream-discharge data from VegET–mizuRoute model against in situ observations across the Central Highlands of Kenya for 2012–2021. Performance was assessed at eight precipitation and six discharge stations using pairwise statistics (RMSE, NSE, CC, RMB) and categorical metrics (POD, FAR) on a monthly scale. Four bias correction techniques (Least Squares, Quantile Mapping, Delta Method, Random Forest) were assessed to enhance the utility of the best-performing SPP and the modelled discharge data. CHIRPS and MSWEP consistently outperformed the other products: CHIRPS achieved RMSE of 34.85–134.26 mm, NSE of −0.94 to 0.44, and CC of 0.52–0.87, while MSWEP recorded RMSE of 24.17–125.66 mm, NSE of −0.91 to 0.65, and CC of 0.45–0.84. The VegET–mizuRoute model reproduced seasonal flow dynamics but showed station-dependent biases, with NSE from −2.28 to 0.23, RMB from −0.59 to 0.77, and CC from 0.46 to 0.71. Following bias correction, Random Forest yielded substantial improvements for both precipitation and discharge, underscoring the capacity of machine learning to address complex, nonlinear biases. It raised precipitation NSE to a consistently positive 0.85–0.95 across all eight stations while halving RMSE at most sites (9.05–46.23 mm). For discharge, Random Forest improved NSE at most stations to 0.80–0.88, with CC rising to 0.92–0.95, except at one station. Our findings confirm that systematic bias remains a dominant error source in global hydrological products in this region, and that machine learning-based bias correction is essential for the operational reliability and accuracy of these datasets for water management and flood applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Water
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000623
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Toward reliable water resource assessment: Correcting bias in satellite-based rainfall and model-derived discharge in Kenya’s Central Highlands

Kirubel Mekonnen, Komlavi Akpoti, Afua G. Owusu, Emma Odera et al.
PLOS Water
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
article

Toward reliable water resource assessment: Correcting bias in satellite-based rainfall and model-derived discharge in Kenya’s Central Highlands

Kirubel Mekonnen, Komlavi Akpoti, Afua G. Owusu, Emma Odera, Felicia Yeboah, Naga Velpuri, Elias Muluken Adamseged, Mansoor Leh
article en

Abstract

Reliable precipitation and streamflow data are essential for hydrological modelling and water resources management, yet observational networks in many African regions remain sparse. This study evaluated five satellite precipitation products (SPPs) CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CCS, PERSIANN-PDIR, TAMSAT, and MSWEP and modelled stream-discharge data from VegET–mizuRoute model against in situ observations across the Central Highlands of Kenya for 2012–2021. Performance was assessed at eight precipitation and six discharge stations using pairwise statistics (RMSE, NSE, CC, RMB) and categorical metrics (POD, FAR) on a monthly scale. Four bias correction techniques (Least Squares, Quantile Mapping, Delta Method, Random Forest) were assessed to enhance the utility of the best-performing SPP and the modelled discharge data. CHIRPS and MSWEP consistently outperformed the other products: CHIRPS achieved RMSE of 34.85–134.26 mm, NSE of −0.94 to 0.44, and CC of 0.52–0.87, while MSWEP recorded RMSE of 24.17–125.66 mm, NSE of −0.91 to 0.65, and CC of 0.45–0.84. The VegET–mizuRoute model reproduced seasonal flow dynamics but showed station-dependent biases, with NSE from −2.28 to 0.23, RMB from −0.59 to 0.77, and CC from 0.46 to 0.71. Following bias correction, Random Forest yielded substantial improvements for both precipitation and discharge, underscoring the capacity of machine learning to address complex, nonlinear biases. It raised precipitation NSE to a consistently positive 0.85–0.95 across all eight stations while halving RMSE at most sites (9.05–46.23 mm). For discharge, Random Forest improved NSE at most stations to 0.80–0.88, with CC rising to 0.92–0.95, except at one station. Our findings confirm that systematic bias remains a dominant error source in global hydrological products in this region, and that machine learning-based bias correction is essential for the operational reliability and accuracy of these datasets for water management and flood applications.

PLOS WaterVol. 5(9)
University of Ghana (GH), International Water Management Institute (IWMI) (LK)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.