Configuration Paths of AI-Driven Urban Green Innovation: A Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the TOE Framework

Artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly been recognized as an important driver of green innovation, yet how cities leverage AI capabilities to achieve green innovation outcomes under different configurations of conditions remains insufficiently understood. This study develops a configurational framework based on the technology–organization–environment (TOE) perspective and applies dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to panel data from 35 Chinese cities, comprising municipalities directly under the central government, provincial capitals, and sub-provincial cities, during 2019–2023. The results identify three configurations associated with high urban green innovation. AI Technology Development and AI Institutional Support consistently emerge as core conditions across all configurations, while AI Organizational Scale is identified as a recurring peripheral condition. The findings further reveal causal asymmetry between high and non-high levels of urban green innovation, showing that individual AI-related conditions alone are insufficient to achieve high green innovation outcomes without complementary conditions. Dynamic analysis indicates that the overall configurational structures remain relatively stable over time, although the consistency of individual configurations varies as AI applications and policy environments evolve. This study advances research on AI and green innovation by demonstrating that AI-driven urban green innovation depends on the interplay among multiple conditions and involves both stable foundational factors and evolving complementary conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18199842
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Configuration Paths of AI-Driven Urban Green Innovation: A Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the TOE Framework

Qi Han, Mingcheng Zhang
Sustainability
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Configuration Paths of AI-Driven Urban Green Innovation: A Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the TOE Framework

Qi Han, Mingcheng Zhang
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly been recognized as an important driver of green innovation, yet how cities leverage AI capabilities to achieve green innovation outcomes under different configurations of conditions remains insufficiently understood. This study develops a configurational framework based on the technology–organization–environment (TOE) perspective and applies dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to panel data from 35 Chinese cities, comprising municipalities directly under the central government, provincial capitals, and sub-provincial cities, during 2019–2023. The results identify three configurations associated with high urban green innovation. AI Technology Development and AI Institutional Support consistently emerge as core conditions across all configurations, while AI Organizational Scale is identified as a recurring peripheral condition. The findings further reveal causal asymmetry between high and non-high levels of urban green innovation, showing that individual AI-related conditions alone are insufficient to achieve high green innovation outcomes without complementary conditions. Dynamic analysis indicates that the overall configurational structures remain relatively stable over time, although the consistency of individual configurations varies as AI applications and policy environments evolve. This study advances research on AI and green innovation by demonstrating that AI-driven urban green innovation depends on the interplay among multiple conditions and involves both stable foundational factors and evolving complementary conditions.

SustainabilityVol. 18(19)
Tongji University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Configuration Paths of AI-Driven Urban Green Innovation: A Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the TOE Framework — Qi Han, Mingcheng Zhang · Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS