Sensitivity Mapping of Closed-Loop Root Contours from Robust Admissibility to Local Fragility

Robust admissibility guarantees that the closed-loop poles remain within a prescribed region, but it does not reveal the locally sensitive portions of the root contours. In this study, a pole sensitivity mapping method is developed that combines modulus–phase decomposition, multiparametric assessment using singular values, and time-domain verification. The method is applied to an uncertain second-order plant with a PI controller and seven tunings numerically confirmed as robustly admissible. For the considered tunings, the maximum local pole sensitivity varies from 1.388 to 43.951, with the tuning having the lowest pole sensitivity not coinciding with having the lowest transient response sensitivity. The results show that the joint quantitative consideration of pole and time-domain sensitivities enables a more substantiated selection among robustly admissible tunings by localizing fragile regions and identifying the nature of pole motion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technologies
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14100608
Primary Topic
Control Systems and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Sensitivity Mapping of Closed-Loop Root Contours from Robust Admissibility to Local Fragility

Vesela A. Karlova-Sergieva
Technologies
Control Systems and Identification
article

Sensitivity Mapping of Closed-Loop Root Contours from Robust Admissibility to Local Fragility

Vesela A. Karlova-Sergieva
article en

Abstract

Robust admissibility guarantees that the closed-loop poles remain within a prescribed region, but it does not reveal the locally sensitive portions of the root contours. In this study, a pole sensitivity mapping method is developed that combines modulus–phase decomposition, multiparametric assessment using singular values, and time-domain verification. The method is applied to an uncertain second-order plant with a PI controller and seven tunings numerically confirmed as robustly admissible. For the considered tunings, the maximum local pole sensitivity varies from 1.388 to 43.951, with the tuning having the lowest pole sensitivity not coinciding with having the lowest transient response sensitivity. The results show that the joint quantitative consideration of pole and time-domain sensitivities enables a more substantiated selection among robustly admissible tunings by localizing fragile regions and identifying the nature of pole motion.

TechnologiesVol. 14(10)
Technical University of Sofia (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Control Systems and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.