Multi-facility GNSS antenna calibration

Abstract Accurate antenna calibrations are a cornerstone of high-quality global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) positioning, time and frequency transfer, precise orbits, and troposphere estimates. The international GNSS service (IGS) antenna committee maintains antenna phase center corrections in the ANTEX file relying on five calibration facilities. Since new calibration facilities have been set up and user demands have grown along with hardware and software updates of GNSS, we organized an international inter-comparison across nine facilities, using both anechoic chambers and field robots. Six antennas with different designs were calibrated by each facility and compared with the Geo++ robot solution (GPP4), a proxy for the IGS ANTEX. Where available, we also considered the IGS type means. We examined differences between the antenna patterns and subsequent differences in station coordinates. To this end, we used a standardized forward simulation as well as multi-GNSS PPP solutions using the GNSS toolbox developed at Leibniz University Hannover, Institut für Erdmessung (IfE). Our study yields several important results. We found that multi-GNSS antenna calibrations exhibit frequency- and elevation-dependent variations, with deviations of up to 3 mm to 4 mm at low elevations. We show that organizations like Topcon (TPS), national geodetic survey (NGS), and Wuhan GNSS Research Center (WHU) yield calibration results that are in very good agreement with those of IGS accepted facilities such as GPP, IfE, and to some extent geoscience Australia (GA). These differences result in position deviations of a few millimeters, with the Up component being the dominant contributor.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geodesy
Published
2026-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-026-02111-3
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multi-facility GNSS antenna calibration

Andreas Brown, G. Hu, Johannes Kröger, Gregor Möller et al.
Journal of Geodesy
GNSS positioning and interference
article

Multi-facility GNSS antenna calibration

Andreas Brown, G. Hu, Johannes Kröger, Gregor Möller, Benedikt S. Soja, Andria L. Bilich, Heiner Kuhlmann, Igor Sutyagin, Stefano Caizzone, Ansgar Dreier, Arturo Villiger, Tobias Kersten, Steffen Schön, Zhigang Hu, Martin Schmitz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurate antenna calibrations are a cornerstone of high-quality global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) positioning, time and frequency transfer, precise orbits, and troposphere estimates. The international GNSS service (IGS) antenna committee maintains antenna phase center corrections in the ANTEX file relying on five calibration facilities. Since new calibration facilities have been set up and user demands have grown along with hardware and software updates of GNSS, we organized an international inter-comparison across nine facilities, using both anechoic chambers and field robots. Six antennas with different designs were calibrated by each facility and compared with the Geo++ robot solution (GPP4), a proxy for the IGS ANTEX. Where available, we also considered the IGS type means. We examined differences between the antenna patterns and subsequent differences in station coordinates. To this end, we used a standardized forward simulation as well as multi-GNSS PPP solutions using the GNSS toolbox developed at Leibniz University Hannover, Institut für Erdmessung (IfE). Our study yields several important results. We found that multi-GNSS antenna calibrations exhibit frequency- and elevation-dependent variations, with deviations of up to 3 mm to 4 mm at low elevations. We show that organizations like Topcon (TPS), national geodetic survey (NGS), and Wuhan GNSS Research Center (WHU) yield calibration results that are in very good agreement with those of IGS accepted facilities such as GPP, IfE, and to some extent geoscience Australia (GA). These differences result in position deviations of a few millimeters, with the Up component being the dominant contributor.

Journal of GeodesyVol. 100(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.