Weights without looms: interpreting textile tools in storage contexts

Abstract While loom weights are ubiquitous in archaeological assemblages across the Mediterranean, few have been recovered in the exact locations where weaving was performed in antiquity. Rather, close analysis of textile tool publications reveals that most loom weights were deposited through various processes of reuse, loss, breakage, construction and storage. In this article, I argue that this final category of storage accounts for a far more significant proportion of archaeological loom weights than is usually recognized. I then explore three interrelated implications of this insight. First, I demonstrate that groups of weights left in storage contexts often only represent a small portion of the full range of tools typically owned by an ancient Greek household. Second, I show how storage offers a window into the decisions people made about what to leave behind in moments of duress. Finally, I assert that implicit in the act of storage is an expectation of retrieval, which in turn sheds light on circulation patterns within households. Altogether, these insights establish how a renewed focus on the storage of loom weights affords a more nuanced picture of the lives of ancient weavers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Hellenic Studies
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0075426926100482
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Weights without looms: interpreting textile tools in storage contexts

Kevin Ennis
The Journal of Hellenic Studies
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Weights without looms: interpreting textile tools in storage contexts

Kevin Ennis
article en

Abstract

Abstract While loom weights are ubiquitous in archaeological assemblages across the Mediterranean, few have been recovered in the exact locations where weaving was performed in antiquity. Rather, close analysis of textile tool publications reveals that most loom weights were deposited through various processes of reuse, loss, breakage, construction and storage. In this article, I argue that this final category of storage accounts for a far more significant proportion of archaeological loom weights than is usually recognized. I then explore three interrelated implications of this insight. First, I demonstrate that groups of weights left in storage contexts often only represent a small portion of the full range of tools typically owned by an ancient Greek household. Second, I show how storage offers a window into the decisions people made about what to leave behind in moments of duress. Finally, I assert that implicit in the act of storage is an expectation of retrieval, which in turn sheds light on circulation patterns within households. Altogether, these insights establish how a renewed focus on the storage of loom weights affords a more nuanced picture of the lives of ancient weavers.

The Journal of Hellenic Studies
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Weights without looms: interpreting textile tools in storage contexts — Kevin Ennis · The Journal of Hellenic Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS