Content characteristics and information quality of flap transplantation surgery videos on TikTok and Bilibili

Flap transplantation is a crucial reconstructive surgical technique, yet public understanding of its principles and postoperative management remains limited. With the rapid rise of short-form video platforms, social media has become an important medium for disseminating medical information. This study aimed to evaluate the content characteristics, educational quality, and reliability of flap transplantation surgery videos on TikTok and Bilibili. A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted to evaluate short videos related to flap transplantation surgery on TikTok and Bilibili. Videos were retrieved on September 25, 2025, using the Chinese keyword “皮瓣移植手术” (“flap transplantation surgery”), and searches were performed on the same day to reduce algorithm-related bias. After excluding duplicate, irrelevant, and commercial content, 236 videos were included. Two independent researchers extracted and verified data on video characteristics and engagement metrics. Educational content and information quality were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 27.0 with the Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Spearman correlation. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Overall, the videos demonstrated moderate quality, with median scores of 3.00 (interquartile range 3.00–4.00) for GQS, 3.00 (2.00–3.00) for mDISCERN, and 3.00 (3.00–4.00) for JAMA. TikTok videos were significantly shorter (52.50 seconds vs 162.00 seconds, P < .001) but achieved higher GQS, mDISCERN, and JAMA scores ( P < .001) compared with Bilibili. Specialist physicians accounted for 69.1% of uploaders and produced videos with significantly higher quality than science communicators or institutional/patient accounts (all pairwise P < .05). Engagement indicators such as likes and shares were strongly correlated with each other (up to r = 0.92) but not with video quality ( P > .05). TikTok and Bilibili play an increasing role in disseminating surgical knowledge about flap transplantation. Although TikTok videos were shorter, they demonstrated higher structural clarity and informational reliability. Videos uploaded by physicians showed the highest accuracy and transparency, while nonprofessional content exhibited lower educational value. These findings highlight the need for improved content regulation, professional participation, and evidence-based design to enhance the educational impact of medical short videos.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000050873
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Content characteristics and information quality of flap transplantation surgery videos on TikTok and Bilibili

Q.H. Chen, Zhixuan Zhang, Kaidi Zhao, Yanqi Li
Medicine
Social Media in Health Education
article

Content characteristics and information quality of flap transplantation surgery videos on TikTok and Bilibili

Q.H. Chen, Zhixuan Zhang, Kaidi Zhao, Yanqi Li
article en

Abstract

Flap transplantation is a crucial reconstructive surgical technique, yet public understanding of its principles and postoperative management remains limited. With the rapid rise of short-form video platforms, social media has become an important medium for disseminating medical information. This study aimed to evaluate the content characteristics, educational quality, and reliability of flap transplantation surgery videos on TikTok and Bilibili. A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted to evaluate short videos related to flap transplantation surgery on TikTok and Bilibili. Videos were retrieved on September 25, 2025, using the Chinese keyword “皮瓣移植手术” (“flap transplantation surgery”), and searches were performed on the same day to reduce algorithm-related bias. After excluding duplicate, irrelevant, and commercial content, 236 videos were included. Two independent researchers extracted and verified data on video characteristics and engagement metrics. Educational content and information quality were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 27.0 with the Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Spearman correlation. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Overall, the videos demonstrated moderate quality, with median scores of 3.00 (interquartile range 3.00–4.00) for GQS, 3.00 (2.00–3.00) for mDISCERN, and 3.00 (3.00–4.00) for JAMA. TikTok videos were significantly shorter (52.50 seconds vs 162.00 seconds, P < .001) but achieved higher GQS, mDISCERN, and JAMA scores ( P < .001) compared with Bilibili. Specialist physicians accounted for 69.1% of uploaders and produced videos with significantly higher quality than science communicators or institutional/patient accounts (all pairwise P < .05). Engagement indicators such as likes and shares were strongly correlated with each other (up to r = 0.92) but not with video quality ( P > .05). TikTok and Bilibili play an increasing role in disseminating surgical knowledge about flap transplantation. Although TikTok videos were shorter, they demonstrated higher structural clarity and informational reliability. Videos uploaded by physicians showed the highest accuracy and transparency, while nonprofessional content exhibited lower educational value. These findings highlight the need for improved content regulation, professional participation, and evidence-based design to enhance the educational impact of medical short videos.

MedicineVol. 105(39)
Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social Media in Health Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.