Comparative Screening Performance of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Assisted Reproduction and Spontaneous Pregnancies

ABSTRACT Objective To compare noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) performance between pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and spontaneously conceived pregnancies, and explore NIPT application characteristics in the ART population. Method A single‐center retrospective study enrolled 193,376 pregnancies undergoing NIPT, divided into assisted conception ( n = 7021) and spontaneous conception ( n = 186,355) groups. Prenatal diagnosis for positive results and follow‐up were conducted. Participant profiles, positive rates, prenatal diagnosis rates and positive predictive values (PPVs) were compared for the two groups. Results The assisted conception group had a higher maternal age (32.12 ± 4.79 years), twin pregnancy rate (13.63%), NIPT failure rate (0.60%), and lower fetal cell‐free DNA fraction (13.11 ± 6.76%). The overall NIPT‐positive rate (1.82%) did not differ between spontaneously conceived pregnancies after adjusting for twin and maternal age ( p = 0.078). No differences in common trisomy‐positive rate, prenatal diagnosis rate, PPVs, or termination of pregnancy were observed between the two groups. The PPVs of NIPT for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs), and copy number variants (CNVs) were also not significant between the two groups. Conclusion NIPT performs comparably for common trisomies, SCAs and CNVs in ART‐conceived and spontaneously conceived pregnancies. But ART pregnancies have higher NIPT failure rates and distinct positive result profiles, requiring targeted genetic counseling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70255
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative Screening Performance of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Assisted Reproduction and Spontaneous Pregnancies

Fengxiang Wei, Weiqiang Liu, Shuxian Zeng, Xianzhen Cao et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Comparative Screening Performance of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Assisted Reproduction and Spontaneous Pregnancies

Fengxiang Wei, Weiqiang Liu, Shuxian Zeng, Xianzhen Cao, Liang Hu, Xiaoyi Liu, Wen Liangzhen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To compare noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) performance between pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and spontaneously conceived pregnancies, and explore NIPT application characteristics in the ART population. Method A single‐center retrospective study enrolled 193,376 pregnancies undergoing NIPT, divided into assisted conception ( n = 7021) and spontaneous conception ( n = 186,355) groups. Prenatal diagnosis for positive results and follow‐up were conducted. Participant profiles, positive rates, prenatal diagnosis rates and positive predictive values (PPVs) were compared for the two groups. Results The assisted conception group had a higher maternal age (32.12 ± 4.79 years), twin pregnancy rate (13.63%), NIPT failure rate (0.60%), and lower fetal cell‐free DNA fraction (13.11 ± 6.76%). The overall NIPT‐positive rate (1.82%) did not differ between spontaneously conceived pregnancies after adjusting for twin and maternal age ( p = 0.078). No differences in common trisomy‐positive rate, prenatal diagnosis rate, PPVs, or termination of pregnancy were observed between the two groups. The PPVs of NIPT for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs), and copy number variants (CNVs) were also not significant between the two groups. Conclusion NIPT performs comparably for common trisomies, SCAs and CNVs in ART‐conceived and spontaneously conceived pregnancies. But ART pregnancies have higher NIPT failure rates and distinct positive result profiles, requiring targeted genetic counseling.

Prenatal Diagnosis
Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.