Limited Assessment of Proportional Hazards Despite More Frequent Violations Identified in Updated Oncology Trial Analyses: Frequency, Patterns, and Statistical Implications

Prior studies suggest that proportional-hazards violations (PHVs) occur in oncology randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and may affect conclusions, but evidence has largely focused on initial reports rather than updated analyses. We examined PH testing practices, frequency, patterns, and statistical implications of PHVs in updated oncology RCTs. We focused on oncology RCTs supporting US Food and Drug Administration approvals. Phase II-III oncology RCTs supporting FDA approvals between 2006 and 2025 were identified. Individual patient data were reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves. PHVs were assessed using Schoenfeld residuals. Treatment effects were analyzed with Cox proportional-hazards models, log-rank tests, MaxCombo, and restricted mean survival time difference (RMSD). Two hundred seventy endpoint comparisons (150 overall survival [OS], 120 non-OS) from 168 RCTs were included. PH testing dropped from 24.1% in initial reports to 11.5% in updates (McNemar p < 0.001). Although PH testing increased over the past decade in initial publications (Wald p < 0.001), no trend in updates (Wald p = 0.29). PHV frequency was numerically higher in updated than initial analyses (38.9% vs. 33.0%). Non-OS endpoints, metastatic settings, and immunotherapy or targeted-therapy regimens were associated with PHVs. Among updated analyses, nominal significance differences between PH-dependent and alternative methods were more frequent with PHVs (MaxCombo: 11.4% vs. 3.6%, chi-square p = 0.012; RMSD: 8.6% vs. 2.4%, chi-square p = 0.021). PHV patterns were diminishing effects (35.2%), delayed separation (27.6%), and crossing hazards (27.6%). PH testing declined in updated analyses despite numerically more frequent PHVs. Although updates are descriptive and do not invalidate original conclusions, unrecognized non-proportionality may affect long-term benefit interpretation, supporting PH diagnostics and prespecified complementary analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70748
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Limited Assessment of Proportional Hazards Despite More Frequent Violations Identified in Updated Oncology Trial Analyses: Frequency, Patterns, and Statistical Implications

Hanqiao Shao, Mingye Zhao, Yuan Li, Hongshu Fang et al.
International Journal of Cancer
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Limited Assessment of Proportional Hazards Despite More Frequent Violations Identified in Updated Oncology Trial Analyses: Frequency, Patterns, and Statistical Implications

Hanqiao Shao, Mingye Zhao, Yuan Li, Hongshu Fang, Yunong Jiang, Yunlin Jiang, Taihang Shao, Wenxi Tang
article en

Abstract

Prior studies suggest that proportional-hazards violations (PHVs) occur in oncology randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and may affect conclusions, but evidence has largely focused on initial reports rather than updated analyses. We examined PH testing practices, frequency, patterns, and statistical implications of PHVs in updated oncology RCTs. We focused on oncology RCTs supporting US Food and Drug Administration approvals. Phase II-III oncology RCTs supporting FDA approvals between 2006 and 2025 were identified. Individual patient data were reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves. PHVs were assessed using Schoenfeld residuals. Treatment effects were analyzed with Cox proportional-hazards models, log-rank tests, MaxCombo, and restricted mean survival time difference (RMSD). Two hundred seventy endpoint comparisons (150 overall survival [OS], 120 non-OS) from 168 RCTs were included. PH testing dropped from 24.1% in initial reports to 11.5% in updates (McNemar p < 0.001). Although PH testing increased over the past decade in initial publications (Wald p < 0.001), no trend in updates (Wald p = 0.29). PHV frequency was numerically higher in updated than initial analyses (38.9% vs. 33.0%). Non-OS endpoints, metastatic settings, and immunotherapy or targeted-therapy regimens were associated with PHVs. Among updated analyses, nominal significance differences between PH-dependent and alternative methods were more frequent with PHVs (MaxCombo: 11.4% vs. 3.6%, chi-square p = 0.012; RMSD: 8.6% vs. 2.4%, chi-square p = 0.021). PHV patterns were diminishing effects (35.2%), delayed separation (27.6%), and crossing hazards (27.6%). PH testing declined in updated analyses despite numerically more frequent PHVs. Although updates are descriptive and do not invalidate original conclusions, unrecognized non-proportionality may affect long-term benefit interpretation, supporting PH diagnostics and prespecified complementary analyses.

International Journal of Cancer
China Pharmaceutical University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Yueyang Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.