External validation of the NADIR model for early prostate‐specific antigen response prediction in enzalutamide‐treated metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer: An analysis of the ARCHES trial

Abstract Background Early favorable prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response to ≤0.2 ng/mL by 6 months is associated with superior overall survival (OS) in metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). The nadir androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI)‐derived integrative response (NADIR) model is a multivariable model developed to predict this early favorable PSA response in patients receiving ARPI. The authors report an independent external validation of the locked NADIR model in the ARCHES trial. Methods Of 574 enzalutamide‐treated patients, 558 with complete predictors were included. Discrimination, Brier score/index of prediction accuracy (IPA), and calibration were assessed. Predicted probability tertiles were used descriptively for PSA response. Six‐month landmark Cox models explored associations with OS. A sensitivity analysis restricted the cohort to <3 months of prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Results Early favorable PSA response occurred in 359 patients (64%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.83), the Brier score was 0.17, and the IPA was 25%. Recalibration intercept was 0.026 and slope was 0.97. Response rates across decreasing predicted probability tertiles were 92%, 64%, and 37%. In the landmark analysis ( n = 547; 177 deaths), each 10‐percentage‐point increase in predicted probability was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85–0.96). In the <3‐month prior‐ADT subgroup ( n = 401), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and IPA were 0.78 and 23%, respectively. Conclusions The NADIR model demonstrates robust and reproducible discrimination, calibration, and prognostic stratification in a distinct ARPI‐treated mHSPC cohort, supporting its potential utility for early response risk stratification and trial enrichment pending prospective validation of model‐guided treatment adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70615
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

External validation of the NADIR model for early prostate‐specific antigen response prediction in enzalutamide‐treated metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer: An analysis of the ARCHES trial

Eric Jay Small, Spyridon P. Basourakos, Scott Carlyle Morgan, Andrew J. Armstrong et al.
Cancer
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

External validation of the NADIR model for early prostate‐specific antigen response prediction in enzalutamide‐treated metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer: An analysis of the ARCHES trial

Eric Jay Small, Spyridon P. Basourakos, Scott Carlyle Morgan, Andrew J. Armstrong, Angela Y. Jia, Jonathan Evan Shoag, Jason Robert Brown, Rana R. McKay, Daniel Eidelberg Spratt, Soumyajit Roy, Samuel Lichtman‐Mikol, Nicholas George Zaorsky, Iris Yeong- Fung Sheng, Neal D. Shore, Christopher J. D. Wallis, Jorge Alberto Garcia, Fred Saad, Amar U. Kishan, Pedro C. Barata, Yilun Sun, Neeraj Agarwal, Yashasvi Mumgandi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Early favorable prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response to ≤0.2 ng/mL by 6 months is associated with superior overall survival (OS) in metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). The nadir androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI)‐derived integrative response (NADIR) model is a multivariable model developed to predict this early favorable PSA response in patients receiving ARPI. The authors report an independent external validation of the locked NADIR model in the ARCHES trial. Methods Of 574 enzalutamide‐treated patients, 558 with complete predictors were included. Discrimination, Brier score/index of prediction accuracy (IPA), and calibration were assessed. Predicted probability tertiles were used descriptively for PSA response. Six‐month landmark Cox models explored associations with OS. A sensitivity analysis restricted the cohort to <3 months of prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Results Early favorable PSA response occurred in 359 patients (64%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.83), the Brier score was 0.17, and the IPA was 25%. Recalibration intercept was 0.026 and slope was 0.97. Response rates across decreasing predicted probability tertiles were 92%, 64%, and 37%. In the landmark analysis ( n = 547; 177 deaths), each 10‐percentage‐point increase in predicted probability was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85–0.96). In the <3‐month prior‐ADT subgroup ( n = 401), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and IPA were 0.78 and 23%, respectively. Conclusions The NADIR model demonstrates robust and reproducible discrimination, calibration, and prognostic stratification in a distinct ARPI‐treated mHSPC cohort, supporting its potential utility for early response risk stratification and trial enrichment pending prospective validation of model‐guided treatment adaptation.

CancerVol. 132(19)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), University of California San Diego (US), University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), University School (US), Carolina Urologic Research Center (US), Moores Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University (US), Université de Montréal (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.