Three decades on: pathways and barriers to practical reconciliation and psychosocial reconstruction in Rwanda after the genocide against the Tutsi

Three decades after the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, Rwanda continues to navigate the complex and evolving process of psychosocial reconstruction and practical reconciliation among survivors, former perpetrators, and their descendants. Despite substantial national and community-based efforts to advance reconciliation, restorative justice, and psychosocial transformation, many individuals continue to experience profound difficulties, including depression, trauma-related distress, anxiety, social mistrust and unresolved grief that impede sustainable recovery, social cohesion, and meaningful coexistence. Important gaps therefore remain in understanding the opportunities and obstacles that shape psychosocial reconstruction and reconciliation in post-genocide settings. The present study addressed these gaps by exploring the pathways and barriers to reconciliation and psychosocial reconstruction in the Rwandan context. Using a qualitative design, we conducted 32 semi-structured interviews with genocide survivors ( n = 5), ex-prisoners ( n = 5), and local leaders ( n = 5) in Nyamagabe District, complemented by three focus-group discussions involving both survivors and ex-prisoners ( n = 7), only survivors ( n = 5) and only perpetrators ( n = 5). Data were analysed inductively using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that post-genocide psychosocial reconstruction and reconciliation have been facilitated by grassroots initiatives particularly traditional justice mechanisms and reinforced by psychosocial programmes led by the government and its partners. However, persistent barriers remain, including ongoing psychosocial difficulties (anxiety, trauma, social mistrust and shame), intergenerational trauma, and limited access to psychosocial services, all of which hinder sustainable social transformation. Overall, the study reveals that practical reconciliation is a dynamic, non-linear process in which community-based engagement, psychosocial healing, and identity reconstruction drive positive change, while structural challenges continue to compromise these gains. These findings suggest that sustained partnership and collaboration among policymakers, mental health professionals, peacebuilders, and academics are essential to advance lasting psychosocial reconstruction, reconciliation, and social cohesion in post-genocide contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09215-3
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Three decades on: pathways and barriers to practical reconciliation and psychosocial reconstruction in Rwanda after the genocide against the Tutsi

Samuel Habimana, Susanne Montgomery, Emmanuel Biracyaza
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Three decades on: pathways and barriers to practical reconciliation and psychosocial reconstruction in Rwanda after the genocide against the Tutsi

Samuel Habimana, Susanne Montgomery, Emmanuel Biracyaza
article en

Abstract

Three decades after the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, Rwanda continues to navigate the complex and evolving process of psychosocial reconstruction and practical reconciliation among survivors, former perpetrators, and their descendants. Despite substantial national and community-based efforts to advance reconciliation, restorative justice, and psychosocial transformation, many individuals continue to experience profound difficulties, including depression, trauma-related distress, anxiety, social mistrust and unresolved grief that impede sustainable recovery, social cohesion, and meaningful coexistence. Important gaps therefore remain in understanding the opportunities and obstacles that shape psychosocial reconstruction and reconciliation in post-genocide settings. The present study addressed these gaps by exploring the pathways and barriers to reconciliation and psychosocial reconstruction in the Rwandan context. Using a qualitative design, we conducted 32 semi-structured interviews with genocide survivors ( n = 5), ex-prisoners ( n = 5), and local leaders ( n = 5) in Nyamagabe District, complemented by three focus-group discussions involving both survivors and ex-prisoners ( n = 7), only survivors ( n = 5) and only perpetrators ( n = 5). Data were analysed inductively using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that post-genocide psychosocial reconstruction and reconciliation have been facilitated by grassroots initiatives particularly traditional justice mechanisms and reinforced by psychosocial programmes led by the government and its partners. However, persistent barriers remain, including ongoing psychosocial difficulties (anxiety, trauma, social mistrust and shame), intergenerational trauma, and limited access to psychosocial services, all of which hinder sustainable social transformation. Overall, the study reveals that practical reconciliation is a dynamic, non-linear process in which community-based engagement, psychosocial healing, and identity reconstruction drive positive change, while structural challenges continue to compromise these gains. These findings suggest that sustained partnership and collaboration among policymakers, mental health professionals, peacebuilders, and academics are essential to advance lasting psychosocial reconstruction, reconciliation, and social cohesion in post-genocide contexts.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Loma Linda University (US), Université de Montréal (CA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.