Bacterial contamination of surgical blades, suction tips, and iodophor drapes in primary joint arthroplasty

Intraoperative bacterial contamination may contribute to microbial transmission during joint arthroplasty, but its distribution across surgical devices and clinical significance remain uncertain. This study aimed to characterize intraoperative bacterial contamination, compare contamination-positive and contamination-negative patients, evaluate contamination across device types, and assess postoperative infection outcomes. This prospective cohort study included 127 patients undergoing primary joint arthroplasty between February 2016 and April 2017. Samples from an unused control blade, skin-incision blade, deep-tissue blade, povidone–iodine-impregnated drape, and suction tip underwent aerobic and anaerobic culture. Patients were classified according to whether at least 1 specimen yielded bacterial growth. Patient-level characteristics were compared between contamination-positive and contamination-negative groups. Device-specific contamination was compared using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for within-patient correlation. Patients were followed for 24 to 38 months. A total of 13 of 127 patients (10.2%) had at least 1 positive culture. After exclusion of suspected sampling or transport contamination, positivity rates were 1.7% for control blades, 5.9% for skin-incision blades, 0.8% for deep-tissue blades, 2.5% for povidone–iodine-impregnated drapes, and 2.6% for suction tips. Patient-level demographic, surgical, and comorbidity characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Overall contamination rates differed significantly among device types (GEE Wald χ 2 = 15.14, df = 4; P = .004), although no individual device differed significantly from the control blade; for skin-incision blades, OR = 3.65 (95% CI, 0.73–18.27; P = .116). No surgical-site infections, periprosthetic joint infection, or deep soft-tissue infection occurred during follow-up. Intraoperative bacterial contamination occurred across multiple surgical devices despite standardized perioperative measures, with overall contamination rates differing by device type. Skin-incision blades had the highest observed positivity rate, but no device showed a statistically significant increase versus the control blade. The absence of postoperative infection underscores the distinction between microbiological contamination and clinical infection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000050858
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Bacterial contamination of surgical blades, suction tips, and iodophor drapes in primary joint arthroplasty

Talante Juma, Liang Guang-hua, Heng Liu
Medicine
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

Bacterial contamination of surgical blades, suction tips, and iodophor drapes in primary joint arthroplasty

Talante Juma, Liang Guang-hua, Heng Liu
article en

Abstract

Intraoperative bacterial contamination may contribute to microbial transmission during joint arthroplasty, but its distribution across surgical devices and clinical significance remain uncertain. This study aimed to characterize intraoperative bacterial contamination, compare contamination-positive and contamination-negative patients, evaluate contamination across device types, and assess postoperative infection outcomes. This prospective cohort study included 127 patients undergoing primary joint arthroplasty between February 2016 and April 2017. Samples from an unused control blade, skin-incision blade, deep-tissue blade, povidone–iodine-impregnated drape, and suction tip underwent aerobic and anaerobic culture. Patients were classified according to whether at least 1 specimen yielded bacterial growth. Patient-level characteristics were compared between contamination-positive and contamination-negative groups. Device-specific contamination was compared using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for within-patient correlation. Patients were followed for 24 to 38 months. A total of 13 of 127 patients (10.2%) had at least 1 positive culture. After exclusion of suspected sampling or transport contamination, positivity rates were 1.7% for control blades, 5.9% for skin-incision blades, 0.8% for deep-tissue blades, 2.5% for povidone–iodine-impregnated drapes, and 2.6% for suction tips. Patient-level demographic, surgical, and comorbidity characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Overall contamination rates differed significantly among device types (GEE Wald χ 2 = 15.14, df = 4; P = .004), although no individual device differed significantly from the control blade; for skin-incision blades, OR = 3.65 (95% CI, 0.73–18.27; P = .116). No surgical-site infections, periprosthetic joint infection, or deep soft-tissue infection occurred during follow-up. Intraoperative bacterial contamination occurred across multiple surgical devices despite standardized perioperative measures, with overall contamination rates differing by device type. Skin-incision blades had the highest observed positivity rate, but no device showed a statistically significant increase versus the control blade. The absence of postoperative infection underscores the distinction between microbiological contamination and clinical infection.

MedicineVol. 105(39)
Peking University (CN), Peking University First Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.