Using Earth observation data to predict bird biodiversity in Central Norway

Abstract Earth observation (EO) data products offer opportunities for data-driven decision making in conservation, but questions remain about their applicability for monitoring and predicting spatial variation in biodiversity. For this, a key element is understanding the relevant spatial scales for species associations with their environment, with important implications from the perspective of land-use management. Here, we test the usage of EO data in predicting spatial occurrence patterns of bird species assemblages. We combine classified and unclassified EO data with stratified sampling of Norwegian breeding bird species occurrences in a joint species distribution modelling approach, comparing different spatial scales for the environmental predictors. We show that the applied approach for predicting bird diversity in areas not used for model training gave reliable estimates of the occurrence of some, but not all species. The most informative spatial scale of environmental predictors varied among bird species but had a minor impact on the aggregated results. We obtained reliable predictions of the ranking of areas in terms of species richness, as well as the spatial turnover of species, but failed to accurately predict the nestedness structure of species assemblages between plots, i.e. locations with few species that should have been represented a subset of a more species-diverse location. The level of processing of EO data had only a minor effect on the predictive performance. Thus, the trade-off between often resource demanding pre-processing of land-cover classes versus ecological interpretability are more important for understanding ecological processes behind biodiversity patterns than obtaining the best predictions. Transparent communication of the outlined uncertainties is crucial for research-based biodiversity conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-026-03377-x
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Using Earth observation data to predict bird biodiversity in Central Norway

Ingar Jostein Øien, Ivar Herfindal, Anna Norberg, John Atle Kålås et al.
Biodiversity and Conservation
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Using Earth observation data to predict bird biodiversity in Central Norway

Ingar Jostein Øien, Ivar Herfindal, Anna Norberg, John Atle Kålås, Bernt‐Erik Sæther
article en

Abstract

Abstract Earth observation (EO) data products offer opportunities for data-driven decision making in conservation, but questions remain about their applicability for monitoring and predicting spatial variation in biodiversity. For this, a key element is understanding the relevant spatial scales for species associations with their environment, with important implications from the perspective of land-use management. Here, we test the usage of EO data in predicting spatial occurrence patterns of bird species assemblages. We combine classified and unclassified EO data with stratified sampling of Norwegian breeding bird species occurrences in a joint species distribution modelling approach, comparing different spatial scales for the environmental predictors. We show that the applied approach for predicting bird diversity in areas not used for model training gave reliable estimates of the occurrence of some, but not all species. The most informative spatial scale of environmental predictors varied among bird species but had a minor impact on the aggregated results. We obtained reliable predictions of the ranking of areas in terms of species richness, as well as the spatial turnover of species, but failed to accurately predict the nestedness structure of species assemblages between plots, i.e. locations with few species that should have been represented a subset of a more species-diverse location. The level of processing of EO data had only a minor effect on the predictive performance. Thus, the trade-off between often resource demanding pre-processing of land-cover classes versus ecological interpretability are more important for understanding ecological processes behind biodiversity patterns than obtaining the best predictions. Transparent communication of the outlined uncertainties is crucial for research-based biodiversity conservation.

Biodiversity and ConservationVol. 35(12)
University of Helsinki (FI), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), BirdLife International (KE), Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NO), MarLife (Norway) (NO), Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NO)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.