A Prospective Study on the Financial Impact of Breast Cancer Treatment over a 1-Year Period for Patients at a Rural Cancer Center

Abstract Background: Patients undergoing breast cancer treatment experience financial toxicity that can lead to stress and affect access to care. This study investigates the financial toxicity patients with breast cancer face. Methods: Change in level of self-reported financial toxicity was evaluated by determining the difference with the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity–Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT). The survey was administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months to patients undergoing treatment within a rural cancer center to understand patterns with financial toxicity. A higher score indicated less financial toxicity. Health insurance literacy data (at baseline and 1 year) and support services data (at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months) were also collected through survey distribution. Demographic data were also collected. Results: Among 102 patients, COST-FACIT scores significantly increased over the course of the year ( P < 0.001) and combined scores were significantly higher for patients at or above the age of 65 years ( P = 0.001). There was no statistical difference between insurance type (private or public) or between the stages of breast cancer. Interrelationship analysis showed a negative correlation between COST-FACIT score and support service utilization, but not with health insurance literacy. Discussion: COST-FACIT scores were higher with treatment over time and if the patient was 65 years of age or over. Additional financial support may be beneficial to patients early on in their cancer treatment, as well as patients under the age of 65 years, although further work is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Guthrie Clinic Journal of Medicine
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/guthrie-2025-0012
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Prospective Study on the Financial Impact of Breast Cancer Treatment over a 1-Year Period for Patients at a Rural Cancer Center

Apurva Inamdar, Christopher D. Manko, Jennifer Panek, Nathan Witteveen et al.
The Guthrie Clinic Journal of Medicine
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

A Prospective Study on the Financial Impact of Breast Cancer Treatment over a 1-Year Period for Patients at a Rural Cancer Center

Apurva Inamdar, Christopher D. Manko, Jennifer Panek, Nathan Witteveen, Emily Thresher, Cynthia Perry-Keaty, Jeremy Albright, Khadija Khan, Tyler Zlupko
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Patients undergoing breast cancer treatment experience financial toxicity that can lead to stress and affect access to care. This study investigates the financial toxicity patients with breast cancer face. Methods: Change in level of self-reported financial toxicity was evaluated by determining the difference with the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity–Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT). The survey was administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months to patients undergoing treatment within a rural cancer center to understand patterns with financial toxicity. A higher score indicated less financial toxicity. Health insurance literacy data (at baseline and 1 year) and support services data (at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months) were also collected through survey distribution. Demographic data were also collected. Results: Among 102 patients, COST-FACIT scores significantly increased over the course of the year ( P < 0.001) and combined scores were significantly higher for patients at or above the age of 65 years ( P = 0.001). There was no statistical difference between insurance type (private or public) or between the stages of breast cancer. Interrelationship analysis showed a negative correlation between COST-FACIT score and support service utilization, but not with health insurance literacy. Discussion: COST-FACIT scores were higher with treatment over time and if the patient was 65 years of age or over. Additional financial support may be beneficial to patients early on in their cancer treatment, as well as patients under the age of 65 years, although further work is needed.

The Guthrie Clinic Journal of Medicine
Guthrie Foundation (US), Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.