Genetically modified organisms and agricultural productivity: evidence from OECD developed economies

How biotechnological innovations connect with aggregate productivity growth in agriculture amid a changing climate remains a critical question. This paper examines the aggregate effects of genetically modified and gene-edited organisms (GMOs) using a novel dataset of harmonized agricultural production accounts for 15 OECD countries over 1973–2016. To identify causal effects, we employ a staggered difference-in-differences design that exploits exogenous cross-regional variation in crop-specific agro-climatic suitability combined with temporal variation in new patent registrations. Our results show that GMO adoption has a negligible impact on aggregate agricultural total factor productivity (TFP). Instead, the primary channel operates through a substantial reduction in the productivity of capital deepening for labour productivity growth. Although these findings pertain specifically to high-income, capital-intensive agricultural systems, their implications for developing economies are equally clear: because GMO adoption does not raise aggregate TFP in advanced economies, it is unlikely to serve as a mechanism for closing the large cross-country agricultural productivity gaps documented in the development-accounting literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2736820
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Genetically modified organisms and agricultural productivity: evidence from OECD developed economies

Robert G. Chambers, Yu Sheng
Applied Economics
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Genetically modified organisms and agricultural productivity: evidence from OECD developed economies

Robert G. Chambers, Yu Sheng
article en

Abstract

How biotechnological innovations connect with aggregate productivity growth in agriculture amid a changing climate remains a critical question. This paper examines the aggregate effects of genetically modified and gene-edited organisms (GMOs) using a novel dataset of harmonized agricultural production accounts for 15 OECD countries over 1973–2016. To identify causal effects, we employ a staggered difference-in-differences design that exploits exogenous cross-regional variation in crop-specific agro-climatic suitability combined with temporal variation in new patent registrations. Our results show that GMO adoption has a negligible impact on aggregate agricultural total factor productivity (TFP). Instead, the primary channel operates through a substantial reduction in the productivity of capital deepening for labour productivity growth. Although these findings pertain specifically to high-income, capital-intensive agricultural systems, their implications for developing economies are equally clear: because GMO adoption does not raise aggregate TFP in advanced economies, it is unlikely to serve as a mechanism for closing the large cross-country agricultural productivity gaps documented in the development-accounting literature.

Applied Economics
Australian National University (AU), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.