Do school smartphone policies work? A multiple case study of five South African high schools

Smartphone ownership among adolescents has risen significantly over the past decade, leading many schools to implement policies restricting or banning phone use during school hours. However, the effectiveness of these policies, particularly in relation to academic performance, remains uncertain. To contribute knowledge in this domain, the notion of in-school smartphone vigilance (ISSV) is adopted to describe learners’ cognitive involvement with their smartphones during the school day. A mixed-methods, multiple-case study across five public high schools was conducted to determine, firstly, whether educators’ enactment of restrictive smartphone policies explains variance in learners’ ISSV, and, secondly, whether ISSV is associated with academic performance outcomes. To address these questions, data collected from learners, educators and school management teams were compared across the five cases. The findings indicate that, if consistently enacted in class settings, restrictive policies are associated with lower ISSV. Additionally, across the full sample of learners (n = 963), a small, negative association between ISSV and academic performance is observed, suggesting that cognitive involvement with smartphones at school limits learners’ capacity to concentrate on academic work. It is proposed that schools should adopt a holistic approach when developing smartphone policies which, in addition to academic performance, considers teacher and learner well-being more broadly.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal of Science
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2026/22365
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Do school smartphone policies work? A multiple case study of five South African high schools

Jennifer Feldman, Daniel B. le Roux
South African Journal of Science
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

Do school smartphone policies work? A multiple case study of five South African high schools

Jennifer Feldman, Daniel B. le Roux
article en

Abstract

Smartphone ownership among adolescents has risen significantly over the past decade, leading many schools to implement policies restricting or banning phone use during school hours. However, the effectiveness of these policies, particularly in relation to academic performance, remains uncertain. To contribute knowledge in this domain, the notion of in-school smartphone vigilance (ISSV) is adopted to describe learners’ cognitive involvement with their smartphones during the school day. A mixed-methods, multiple-case study across five public high schools was conducted to determine, firstly, whether educators’ enactment of restrictive smartphone policies explains variance in learners’ ISSV, and, secondly, whether ISSV is associated with academic performance outcomes. To address these questions, data collected from learners, educators and school management teams were compared across the five cases. The findings indicate that, if consistently enacted in class settings, restrictive policies are associated with lower ISSV. Additionally, across the full sample of learners (n = 963), a small, negative association between ISSV and academic performance is observed, suggesting that cognitive involvement with smartphones at school limits learners’ capacity to concentrate on academic work. It is proposed that schools should adopt a holistic approach when developing smartphone policies which, in addition to academic performance, considers teacher and learner well-being more broadly.

South African Journal of ScienceVol. 122(9/10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.