Healed Acetabular Labrum on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated With Superior Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Minimum 2‐Year Follow‐Up

Purpose To investigate the relation between labrum healing status measured via magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Methods Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome at our institute between 2012 and 2020 with a minimum 2‐year follow‐up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the change in labral injury grades from preoperative to postoperative: unchanged group, improvement group, healed group, and worsening group. Supine anteroposterior hip radiographs, 45° Dunn view radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained for all patients preoperatively and postoperatively. Preoperative and final follow‐up scores on the visual analog scale for pain and the modified Harris Hip Score were compared between groups with the 1‐way ANOVA. Results A total of 220 patients (mean age, 37.3 years; 104 men, 116 women) were included, with a minimum follow‐up time of 2 years. The percentages of the total number of patients in the unchanged group, improvement group, healed group, and worsening group are 28.6%, 23.6%, 38.2%, and 9.6%, respectively. The healed group, the unchanged group, and the worsening group had significantly lower preoperative labral injury grades compared with the improvement group ( P < .001). The healed group showed a superior achievement rate of the minimal clinically important difference for the visual analog scale compared with the worsening group ( P = .032). The healed group showed a superior achievement rate of the patient acceptable symptomatic state for the modified Harris Hip Score compared with the worsening group and the unchanged group ( P = .004). Conclusions Magnetic resonance imaging‐measured labral healing may be associated with superior achievement of clinically significant outcomes, particularly when the labrum is healed compared with worsened or unchanged status. However, this classification requires validation, and absolute postoperative modified Harris Hip Score and visual analog scale scores did not differ significantly between groups. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70611
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Healed Acetabular Labrum on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated With Superior Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Minimum 2‐Year Follow‐Up

Yan Xu, Yichuan Zhu, Weijie Lin, Guanying Gao et al.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Healed Acetabular Labrum on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated With Superior Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Minimum 2‐Year Follow‐Up

Yan Xu, Yichuan Zhu, Weijie Lin, Guanying Gao, Jianquan Wang
article en

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the relation between labrum healing status measured via magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Methods Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome at our institute between 2012 and 2020 with a minimum 2‐year follow‐up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the change in labral injury grades from preoperative to postoperative: unchanged group, improvement group, healed group, and worsening group. Supine anteroposterior hip radiographs, 45° Dunn view radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained for all patients preoperatively and postoperatively. Preoperative and final follow‐up scores on the visual analog scale for pain and the modified Harris Hip Score were compared between groups with the 1‐way ANOVA. Results A total of 220 patients (mean age, 37.3 years; 104 men, 116 women) were included, with a minimum follow‐up time of 2 years. The percentages of the total number of patients in the unchanged group, improvement group, healed group, and worsening group are 28.6%, 23.6%, 38.2%, and 9.6%, respectively. The healed group, the unchanged group, and the worsening group had significantly lower preoperative labral injury grades compared with the improvement group ( P < .001). The healed group showed a superior achievement rate of the minimal clinically important difference for the visual analog scale compared with the worsening group ( P = .032). The healed group showed a superior achievement rate of the patient acceptable symptomatic state for the modified Harris Hip Score compared with the worsening group and the unchanged group ( P = .004). Conclusions Magnetic resonance imaging‐measured labral healing may be associated with superior achievement of clinically significant outcomes, particularly when the labrum is healed compared with worsened or unchanged status. However, this classification requires validation, and absolute postoperative modified Harris Hip Score and visual analog scale scores did not differ significantly between groups. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Peking University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.