Saying ‘more than usual’ by saying less than usual: utterance-final conjoint forms in Xhosa and Southern Ndebele

Abstract Many Bantu languages make a distinction between conjoint verb forms, which have a close bond with the following constituent and – crucially – can never occur utterance finally, and disjoint forms, which lack such a bond and restriction. We report on conjoint-like forms in the South African languages that violate this constraint: they can occur in utterance-final position, and they indicate that an eventuality held (or holds) to an unusual extent. We provide evidence that these final conjoint (FC) forms are directly related to “regular” conjoint forms, and we argue that they developed via speakers’ use of a form in an unexpected syntactic context, conveying a meaning that draws attention to the unexpected nature of the eventuality referenced. They thereby represent a previously undescribed pathway of semantic change related to the conjoint–disjoint distinction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of African Languages and Linguistics
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2025-0085
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Saying ‘more than usual’ by saying less than usual: utterance-final conjoint forms in Xhosa and Southern Ndebele

Lotta Aunio, Thera Marie Crane, Msuswa Petrus Mabena, Eva-Marie Bloom Ström et al.
Journal of African Languages and Linguistics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Saying ‘more than usual’ by saying less than usual: utterance-final conjoint forms in Xhosa and Southern Ndebele

Lotta Aunio, Thera Marie Crane, Msuswa Petrus Mabena, Eva-Marie Bloom Ström, Onelisa Slater
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many Bantu languages make a distinction between conjoint verb forms, which have a close bond with the following constituent and – crucially – can never occur utterance finally, and disjoint forms, which lack such a bond and restriction. We report on conjoint-like forms in the South African languages that violate this constraint: they can occur in utterance-final position, and they indicate that an eventuality held (or holds) to an unusual extent. We provide evidence that these final conjoint (FC) forms are directly related to “regular” conjoint forms, and we argue that they developed via speakers’ use of a form in an unexpected syntactic context, conveying a meaning that draws attention to the unexpected nature of the eventuality referenced. They thereby represent a previously undescribed pathway of semantic change related to the conjoint–disjoint distinction.

Journal of African Languages and Linguistics
University of Helsinki (FI), University of South Africa (ZA), Rhodes University (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Saying ‘more than usual’ by saying less than usual: utterance-final conjoint forms in Xhosa and Southern Ndebele — Lotta Aunio, Thera Marie Crane, et al. · Journal of African Languages and Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS