Globally widespread weeds show preadaptation to non‐analogue climates: a common garden approach

Climatic niche shifts have been documented for plant species introduced into new regions, however the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Niche shifts into novel climates are particularly difficult to predict as previous occurrence data cannot reveal whether these novel climates are within species' fundamental niche limits. We have previously shown that three globally widespread species ( Rumex obtusifolius, R. crispus, R. conglomeratus ) have undergone a realised niche shift into both analogue and non‐analogue climates in New Zealand. Here we tested two alternative explanations for this realized niche shift 1) that weeds have adapted since introduction, potentially indicating shifts in their fundamental niches, or 2) that they were preadapted to these climates prior to their arrival. For each species, we collected seeds from the native range (United Kingdom) and their introduced range (New Zealand) and established common gardens in the introduced range under climates either analogous or novel compared to the native range. We compared the relative fitness of individuals from the native and introduced ranges for each species across three critical life stages: germination, survival to reproduction, and fertility. Contrary to expectations, individuals from the native range performed similarly to or better than individuals from the introduced range under all climates. Rumex obtusifolius , performed better under non‐analogue climatic conditions compared to the analogue climate common garden. Our results show little‐to‐no evidence that these species have locally adapted to their environments since introduction, and where differences in performance between individuals from different ranges occurred, individuals from the native range typically outperformed individuals from local populations. We provide empirical evidence that even globally widespread species, as opposed to only range restricted species, undergo realised niche shifts representing previously unmeasured environmental tolerances. We highlight the pressing need for a greater understanding of species' fundamental niches to understand the potential extent of biological invasions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/oik.12163
Primary Topic
Biological Control of Invasive Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Globally widespread weeds show preadaptation to non‐analogue climates: a common garden approach

William Godsoe, Philip Eric Hulme, Jennifer L. Bufford, Thomas F. Carlin
Oikos
Biological Control of Invasive Species
article

Globally widespread weeds show preadaptation to non‐analogue climates: a common garden approach

William Godsoe, Philip Eric Hulme, Jennifer L. Bufford, Thomas F. Carlin
article en

Abstract

Climatic niche shifts have been documented for plant species introduced into new regions, however the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Niche shifts into novel climates are particularly difficult to predict as previous occurrence data cannot reveal whether these novel climates are within species' fundamental niche limits. We have previously shown that three globally widespread species ( Rumex obtusifolius, R. crispus, R. conglomeratus ) have undergone a realised niche shift into both analogue and non‐analogue climates in New Zealand. Here we tested two alternative explanations for this realized niche shift 1) that weeds have adapted since introduction, potentially indicating shifts in their fundamental niches, or 2) that they were preadapted to these climates prior to their arrival. For each species, we collected seeds from the native range (United Kingdom) and their introduced range (New Zealand) and established common gardens in the introduced range under climates either analogous or novel compared to the native range. We compared the relative fitness of individuals from the native and introduced ranges for each species across three critical life stages: germination, survival to reproduction, and fertility. Contrary to expectations, individuals from the native range performed similarly to or better than individuals from the introduced range under all climates. Rumex obtusifolius , performed better under non‐analogue climatic conditions compared to the analogue climate common garden. Our results show little‐to‐no evidence that these species have locally adapted to their environments since introduction, and where differences in performance between individuals from different ranges occurred, individuals from the native range typically outperformed individuals from local populations. We provide empirical evidence that even globally widespread species, as opposed to only range restricted species, undergo realised niche shifts representing previously unmeasured environmental tolerances. We highlight the pressing need for a greater understanding of species' fundamental niches to understand the potential extent of biological invasions.

Oikos
Lincoln University (NZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Biological Control of Invasive Species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.