Artificial Psychological Engineering: A Taxonomy and Audit Framework for AI Systems That Shape Emotion and Behavior

AI systems increasingly sense users' affective states and adapt their behavior to change what users feel, believe, and do. The same techniques appear in mental-health chatbots, workplace tools, AI companions, tutors, and engagement-maximizing feeds, with very different consequences for users. We introduce Artificial Psychological Engineering (APE) as an umbrella term for the deliberate design of AI systems to influence psychological states, and propose a four-axis taxonomy classifying systems by mechanism, transparency, goal alignment with the user, and adaptivity. From it we derive an audit procedure with red-flag combinations, apply it to five system classes, map it to current regulation including the EU AI Act and India's DPDP Act 2023, and propose a validation plan. We argue that risk rises most sharply with the combination of high adaptivity, low transparency, and goals that diverge from the user's own.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22967344
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Artificial Psychological Engineering: A Taxonomy and Audit Framework for AI Systems That Shape Emotion and Behavior

Shubham Jha
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Mental Health Interventions
preprint

Artificial Psychological Engineering: A Taxonomy and Audit Framework for AI Systems That Shape Emotion and Behavior

Shubham Jha
preprint en

Abstract

AI systems increasingly sense users' affective states and adapt their behavior to change what users feel, believe, and do. The same techniques appear in mental-health chatbots, workplace tools, AI companions, tutors, and engagement-maximizing feeds, with very different consequences for users. We introduce Artificial Psychological Engineering (APE) as an umbrella term for the deliberate design of AI systems to influence psychological states, and propose a four-axis taxonomy classifying systems by mechanism, transparency, goal alignment with the user, and adaptivity. From it we derive an audit procedure with red-flag combinations, apply it to five system classes, map it to current regulation including the EU AI Act and India's DPDP Act 2023, and propose a validation plan. We argue that risk rises most sharply with the combination of high adaptivity, low transparency, and goals that diverge from the user's own.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.