Developing Effective, Evidence-Based Training for Cancer Team Science Leadership for National Impact

A 2025 National Academies' report, The Science and Practice of Team Science, identified critical gaps in leadership development and highlighted evidence-based best practices and infrastructure needs to enhance team science. This brief perspective addresses team science approaches needed to overcome the complexities of cancer biology, carcinogenesis, and the processes for advancing cancer knowledge and clinical practice to effectively develop novel interventions. To define evidence-based leadership education programs rooted in the National Academies' report and tailored for cancer researchers, we conducted a survey-based educational needs assessment and performed a structured literature review using Medical Subject Headings terms for cancer and team science. The review identified 53 articles with few focused on team science leadership and none on team science leadership training for cancer research. Survey responses from 58 national cancer research leaders involved in NCI P30 CCSG (n=45), P01 (n=18), U54 (n=18), and P50 SPORE (n=16) programs identified key skills for successful team science leadership: team leadership, strategic planning, grant planning/writing, translational/clinical leadership, science communication, mentorship, and conflict resolution. Cancer research leaders identified the biggest gaps in current training as: team leadership, conflict resolution, team evaluation/metrics, systems thinking and analysis, and institutional navigation. From 68 mid-career faculty representing the audience for training, self-assessments revealed developing/managing large research grants, managing shared resources, and interdependencies as the most desired topics for training with most preferring training in‑person. Delivering structured training in the competencies of team science will better prepare established, independent investigators to lead larger complex, multi-component cancer research programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-1008
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Developing Effective, Evidence-Based Training for Cancer Team Science Leadership for National Impact

Ernest T. Hawk, Christopher R. Flowers, Shine Chang, Hwa Young Lee
Clinical Cancer Research
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Developing Effective, Evidence-Based Training for Cancer Team Science Leadership for National Impact

Ernest T. Hawk, Christopher R. Flowers, Shine Chang, Hwa Young Lee
article en

Abstract

A 2025 National Academies' report, The Science and Practice of Team Science, identified critical gaps in leadership development and highlighted evidence-based best practices and infrastructure needs to enhance team science. This brief perspective addresses team science approaches needed to overcome the complexities of cancer biology, carcinogenesis, and the processes for advancing cancer knowledge and clinical practice to effectively develop novel interventions. To define evidence-based leadership education programs rooted in the National Academies' report and tailored for cancer researchers, we conducted a survey-based educational needs assessment and performed a structured literature review using Medical Subject Headings terms for cancer and team science. The review identified 53 articles with few focused on team science leadership and none on team science leadership training for cancer research. Survey responses from 58 national cancer research leaders involved in NCI P30 CCSG (n=45), P01 (n=18), U54 (n=18), and P50 SPORE (n=16) programs identified key skills for successful team science leadership: team leadership, strategic planning, grant planning/writing, translational/clinical leadership, science communication, mentorship, and conflict resolution. Cancer research leaders identified the biggest gaps in current training as: team leadership, conflict resolution, team evaluation/metrics, systems thinking and analysis, and institutional navigation. From 68 mid-career faculty representing the audience for training, self-assessments revealed developing/managing large research grants, managing shared resources, and interdependencies as the most desired topics for training with most preferring training in‑person. Delivering structured training in the competencies of team science will better prepare established, independent investigators to lead larger complex, multi-component cancer research programs.

Clinical Cancer Research
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.