Rethinking the Action Observation and Execution Network After Early Brain Damage: A Developmental Framework for Cerebral Palsy

Background/Objectives: The action observation and execution network (AOEN) is thought to support action perception–execution coupling and it may contribute to motor learning during development. In cerebral palsy (CP), early brain lesions occur while sensorimotor and cognitive networks are still developing, potentially reshaping AOEN organization and the mechanisms through which children learn from observed actions. This narrative review examines current evidence on AOEN involvement during action observation and execution in CP and proposes a neuroconstructivist framework for personalized observation-based rehabilitation. Methods: We synthesized behavioural, neuroimaging, and intervention studies investigating AOEN functioning, structural and functional reorganization, and Action Observation Treatment (AOT) in children with CP, with particular attention to unilateral and bilateral phenotypes. Results: Available evidence suggests that action observation–execution mechanisms remain functionally responsive in CP, although their organization may be altered according to lesion architecture, distributed network connectivity, and acquired motor experience. Motor impairment may influence the encoding of kinematics, goals, and action sequences, while models whose movements are closer to the child’s motor repertoire have been associated with greater neural engagement and preliminary short-term treatment benefits. Praxis, attention, working memory, visuospatial processing, and executive functions may further influence the transformation of observed actions into executable motor programmes. Conclusions: We propose that rehabilitation response may reflect the interaction among structural and functional reorganization, motor phenotype, neuropsychological functioning, environmental experience, and stimulus characteristics. The AOEN may therefore be better conceptualized as a developmentally reconfigured network rather than a uniformly preserved or impaired system. Multimodal phenotyping may help support more developmentally informed and individualized observation-based rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13101303
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Rethinking the Action Observation and Execution Network After Early Brain Damage: A Developmental Framework for Cerebral Palsy

Donatella Saviola, Antonio De Tanti, Antonino Errante, Giuseppe Ciullo et al.
Children
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Rethinking the Action Observation and Execution Network After Early Brain Damage: A Developmental Framework for Cerebral Palsy

Donatella Saviola, Antonio De Tanti, Antonino Errante, Giuseppe Ciullo, Eleonora Sicuri
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The action observation and execution network (AOEN) is thought to support action perception–execution coupling and it may contribute to motor learning during development. In cerebral palsy (CP), early brain lesions occur while sensorimotor and cognitive networks are still developing, potentially reshaping AOEN organization and the mechanisms through which children learn from observed actions. This narrative review examines current evidence on AOEN involvement during action observation and execution in CP and proposes a neuroconstructivist framework for personalized observation-based rehabilitation. Methods: We synthesized behavioural, neuroimaging, and intervention studies investigating AOEN functioning, structural and functional reorganization, and Action Observation Treatment (AOT) in children with CP, with particular attention to unilateral and bilateral phenotypes. Results: Available evidence suggests that action observation–execution mechanisms remain functionally responsive in CP, although their organization may be altered according to lesion architecture, distributed network connectivity, and acquired motor experience. Motor impairment may influence the encoding of kinematics, goals, and action sequences, while models whose movements are closer to the child’s motor repertoire have been associated with greater neural engagement and preliminary short-term treatment benefits. Praxis, attention, working memory, visuospatial processing, and executive functions may further influence the transformation of observed actions into executable motor programmes. Conclusions: We propose that rehabilitation response may reflect the interaction among structural and functional reorganization, motor phenotype, neuropsychological functioning, environmental experience, and stimulus characteristics. The AOEN may therefore be better conceptualized as a developmentally reconfigured network rather than a uniformly preserved or impaired system. Multimodal phenotyping may help support more developmentally informed and individualized observation-based rehabilitation.

ChildrenVol. 13(10)
University of Parma (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.