Pregnancy-associated unmet dental care need despite lower unmet general care need: evidence of a dental-specific gap from two national surveys

Abstract Background Pregnant women are commonly regarded as a vulnerable, under-served group for oral health, and their low use of dental care is usually framed as a problem of access. Whether this frame fits has rarely been tested with perception, access, and clinical status examined together. Methods We conducted a parallel mixed-methods triangulation in women of reproductive age (19–49 years) across two national surveys. The Korea Community Health Survey (2018–2019) provided self-rated oral health, unmet dental and general care need, and free-text reasons analysed by qualitative content analysis (two independent coders); the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007–2018) provided clinically examined periodontitis. Both were analysed with complex-sample methods and integrated through a joint display. Results Among 92,130 reproductive-age women (2,070 pregnant), unmet dental care need was higher in pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 1.11–1.43), whereas unmet non-dental care need was lower (0.65 in 2018 and 0.56 in 2019). Self-rated oral health did not differ (ordinal odds ratio 0.92, 0.84–1.01). The residual “other” category was the most frequently reported reason among pregnant women (38.3% vs. 6.5%), while cost (6.9% vs. 14.4%) and time/access (30.8% vs. 48.0%) were reported less often; among the 156 analysable free-text responses in that category (Cohen’s κ = 0.72), 92.9% were pregnancy-attributed. Adjusted clinical periodontal outcomes were not lower: the odds ratio was 1.48 (0.96–2.27) for the pocket-based periodontitis definition and 1.40 (1.07–1.83) for any periodontal sign. Conclusions Pregnancy was associated with a dental-specific gap in care: unmet dental-care need was higher while unmet general-care need was not, and pregnancy-related reasons were prominent whereas conventional cost and time/access barriers were reported less often. This occurred despite self-perceived oral health that was no worse and no clear evidence of better clinical periodontal status. Antenatal care may be a useful point at which to address pregnancy-related considerations regarding dental care, while recognising that the timing of elective treatment warrants clinical judgement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-10021-1
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Pregnancy-associated unmet dental care need despite lower unmet general care need: evidence of a dental-specific gap from two national surveys

Seon-Jip Kim, Hyun-Jae Cho
BMC Oral Health
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Pregnancy-associated unmet dental care need despite lower unmet general care need: evidence of a dental-specific gap from two national surveys

Seon-Jip Kim, Hyun-Jae Cho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Pregnant women are commonly regarded as a vulnerable, under-served group for oral health, and their low use of dental care is usually framed as a problem of access. Whether this frame fits has rarely been tested with perception, access, and clinical status examined together. Methods We conducted a parallel mixed-methods triangulation in women of reproductive age (19–49 years) across two national surveys. The Korea Community Health Survey (2018–2019) provided self-rated oral health, unmet dental and general care need, and free-text reasons analysed by qualitative content analysis (two independent coders); the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007–2018) provided clinically examined periodontitis. Both were analysed with complex-sample methods and integrated through a joint display. Results Among 92,130 reproductive-age women (2,070 pregnant), unmet dental care need was higher in pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 1.11–1.43), whereas unmet non-dental care need was lower (0.65 in 2018 and 0.56 in 2019). Self-rated oral health did not differ (ordinal odds ratio 0.92, 0.84–1.01). The residual “other” category was the most frequently reported reason among pregnant women (38.3% vs. 6.5%), while cost (6.9% vs. 14.4%) and time/access (30.8% vs. 48.0%) were reported less often; among the 156 analysable free-text responses in that category (Cohen’s κ = 0.72), 92.9% were pregnancy-attributed. Adjusted clinical periodontal outcomes were not lower: the odds ratio was 1.48 (0.96–2.27) for the pocket-based periodontitis definition and 1.40 (1.07–1.83) for any periodontal sign. Conclusions Pregnancy was associated with a dental-specific gap in care: unmet dental-care need was higher while unmet general-care need was not, and pregnancy-related reasons were prominent whereas conventional cost and time/access barriers were reported less often. This occurred despite self-perceived oral health that was no worse and no clear evidence of better clinical periodontal status. Antenatal care may be a useful point at which to address pregnancy-related considerations regarding dental care, while recognising that the timing of elective treatment warrants clinical judgement.

BMC Oral Health
Seoul National University (KR), Seoul National University Dental Hospital (KR), Dankook University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.