Shear behavior and progressive failure of grout–rock interfaces in soft–hard interbedded rock: Role of soft-layer proportion

The shear behavior of grout–rock interface in soft–hard interbedded rock mass is governed by complex interactions between material heterogeneity and interfacial mechanical properties; however, the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. This study systematically investigates the influence of soft-layer proportion ( α ) on the shear response of grout–rock interface in soft-hard interbedded rock mass through laboratory direct shear tests, numerical simulations, and analytical modeling, where α is defined as the ratio of the soft layer thickness and the total rock thickness. The results show that: (1) the shear stress–displacement response exhibits a transition from a single peak pattern under homogeneous conditions ( α = 0 or 1) to a pronounced double peak behavior in composite systems (0 < α < 1). With the increasing α , both shear strength and shear stiffness decrease nonlinearly, while the residual strength increases due to enhanced surface roughness. Compared with α = 0, the peak shear strength at α = 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 decreases by approximately 23%, 40%, 48%, and 51%, respectively. (2) Numerical results reveal that this nonlinear behavior is governed by normal stress redistribution, which leads to stress concentration on the grout–hard rock interface. The double-peak response is attributed to the sequential failure of grout–soft and grout–hard rock interfaces, accompanied by progressive load transfer. A critical α is identified, beyond which the governing shear strength shifts between the two peak values. (3) An analytical model is further proposed to provide rapid prediction of interfacial shear strength, showing good agreement with experimental and numerical results. Parametric analyses indicate that a larger elastic modulus contrast and interfacial shear stiffness contrast jeopardizes the cooperative load-bearing capacity of the interface, thus reducing in overall shear strength. These findings clarify the mechanical origin of α -dependent strength evolution and double-peak failure behavior of grout–rock interface, providing a theoretical basis and practical guidance for evaluating and optimizing anchorage performance in soft–hard interbedded rock masses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2026.106726
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Shear behavior and progressive failure of grout–rock interfaces in soft–hard interbedded rock: Role of soft-layer proportion

Xuejian Chen, Xingsen Guo, Weizhong Chen, Xiaoyun Shu et al.
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Shear behavior and progressive failure of grout–rock interfaces in soft–hard interbedded rock: Role of soft-layer proportion

Xuejian Chen, Xingsen Guo, Weizhong Chen, Xiaoyun Shu, Rita Leal Sousa, Hongming Tian, Yun Tian
article en

Abstract

The shear behavior of grout–rock interface in soft–hard interbedded rock mass is governed by complex interactions between material heterogeneity and interfacial mechanical properties; however, the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. This study systematically investigates the influence of soft-layer proportion ( α ) on the shear response of grout–rock interface in soft-hard interbedded rock mass through laboratory direct shear tests, numerical simulations, and analytical modeling, where α is defined as the ratio of the soft layer thickness and the total rock thickness. The results show that: (1) the shear stress–displacement response exhibits a transition from a single peak pattern under homogeneous conditions ( α = 0 or 1) to a pronounced double peak behavior in composite systems (0 < α < 1). With the increasing α , both shear strength and shear stiffness decrease nonlinearly, while the residual strength increases due to enhanced surface roughness. Compared with α = 0, the peak shear strength at α = 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 decreases by approximately 23%, 40%, 48%, and 51%, respectively. (2) Numerical results reveal that this nonlinear behavior is governed by normal stress redistribution, which leads to stress concentration on the grout–hard rock interface. The double-peak response is attributed to the sequential failure of grout–soft and grout–hard rock interfaces, accompanied by progressive load transfer. A critical α is identified, beyond which the governing shear strength shifts between the two peak values. (3) An analytical model is further proposed to provide rapid prediction of interfacial shear strength, showing good agreement with experimental and numerical results. Parametric analyses indicate that a larger elastic modulus contrast and interfacial shear stiffness contrast jeopardizes the cooperative load-bearing capacity of the interface, thus reducing in overall shear strength. These findings clarify the mechanical origin of α -dependent strength evolution and double-peak failure behavior of grout–rock interface, providing a theoretical basis and practical guidance for evaluating and optimizing anchorage performance in soft–hard interbedded rock masses.

International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining SciencesVol. 208
New York University Abu Dhabi (AE), Hohai University (CN), Shaoxing University (CN), University of Cambridge (GB), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN), University College London (GB), Ocean University of China (CN), Hainan Tropical Ocean University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.