Integrating physics‐informed symbolic regression with dimensional analysis for UHPC‐jacketed reinforced concrete columns

Abstract Ultra‐high‐performance concrete (UHPC) jacketing is an effective technique for enhancing the axial load capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns; however, current design codes do not provide calibrated analytical equations for such composite members. The strong interaction among geometry, material properties, and reinforcement complicates the development of reliable closed‐form design formulations. While machine learning (ML) models can achieve high predictive accuracy, their black‐box nature limits transparency and hinders adoption in structural design practice. This study proposes a physics‐informed symbolic regression framework aimed at deriving a code‐ready design equation for predicting the ultimate axial capacity of UHPC‐jacketed RC columns. Experimental data compiled from the literature were first transformed into mechanically consistent dimensionless parameters through dimensional analysis, ensuring proper physical scaling and reducing model redundancy. The resulting design equation demonstrates high accuracy on unseen data ( R 2 = 0.988, root mean square error [RMSE] = 194 kN), comparable to representative ML models, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) ( R 2 = 0.98, RMSE = 290 kN) and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) ( R 2 = 0.99, RMSE = 203 kN), while requiring fewer input variables and retaining full analytical transparency. When benchmarked against American Concrete Institute 318 (ACI 318) and Eurocode 2 (EC2) on the test set, the proposed formulation significantly improves predictive performance, reducing RMSE by approximately 71% and 78%, respectively, compared with ACI 318 (RMSE = 675 kN) and EC2 (RMSE = 865 kN). Shapley Additive Explanations‐based interpretation and Sobol sensitivity analysis further confirm the mechanical consistency of the equation, highlighting the dominant contributions of the RC core and UHPC jacket and the activating role of transverse reinforcement in confinement. The proposed formulation provides a transparent and mechanics‐consistent design equation suitable for calibration and potential incorporation into future design provisions for UHPC‐jacketed RC columns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70799
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Integrating physics‐informed symbolic regression with dimensional analysis for UHPC‐jacketed reinforced concrete columns

Viet Hai Hoang, Bao-Viet Tran, Tu Anh, Ba-Anh Le
Structural Concrete
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Integrating physics‐informed symbolic regression with dimensional analysis for UHPC‐jacketed reinforced concrete columns

Viet Hai Hoang, Bao-Viet Tran, Tu Anh, Ba-Anh Le
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ultra‐high‐performance concrete (UHPC) jacketing is an effective technique for enhancing the axial load capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns; however, current design codes do not provide calibrated analytical equations for such composite members. The strong interaction among geometry, material properties, and reinforcement complicates the development of reliable closed‐form design formulations. While machine learning (ML) models can achieve high predictive accuracy, their black‐box nature limits transparency and hinders adoption in structural design practice. This study proposes a physics‐informed symbolic regression framework aimed at deriving a code‐ready design equation for predicting the ultimate axial capacity of UHPC‐jacketed RC columns. Experimental data compiled from the literature were first transformed into mechanically consistent dimensionless parameters through dimensional analysis, ensuring proper physical scaling and reducing model redundancy. The resulting design equation demonstrates high accuracy on unseen data ( R 2 = 0.988, root mean square error [RMSE] = 194 kN), comparable to representative ML models, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) ( R 2 = 0.98, RMSE = 290 kN) and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) ( R 2 = 0.99, RMSE = 203 kN), while requiring fewer input variables and retaining full analytical transparency. When benchmarked against American Concrete Institute 318 (ACI 318) and Eurocode 2 (EC2) on the test set, the proposed formulation significantly improves predictive performance, reducing RMSE by approximately 71% and 78%, respectively, compared with ACI 318 (RMSE = 675 kN) and EC2 (RMSE = 865 kN). Shapley Additive Explanations‐based interpretation and Sobol sensitivity analysis further confirm the mechanical consistency of the equation, highlighting the dominant contributions of the RC core and UHPC jacket and the activating role of transverse reinforcement in confinement. The proposed formulation provides a transparent and mechanics‐consistent design equation suitable for calibration and potential incorporation into future design provisions for UHPC‐jacketed RC columns.

Structural Concrete
University of Transport and Communications (VN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.