Comparative Analysis of Systemic Complications of Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies in Retinal Diseases

Purpose: To compare the systemic safety profiles of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents using a large real-world dataset. Methods: The TriNetX Research Network database was used to identify adults with macular edema secondary to diabetes, retinal vein occlusion, or age-related macular degeneration who received bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept (2012–2022) or faricimab (2022–2024). The bevacizumab cohort was matched with the other cohorts using propensity score matching to account for demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Outcomes included stroke, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, hypertension, brain hemorrhage, and renal function. Results: In the propensity score–matched cohorts comparing outcomes between bevacizumab and aflibercept (each n = 9538), bevacizumab was associated with higher mean blood urea nitrogen level (28.07 mg/dL vs 26.89 mg/dL; P = .017), higher mean serum creatinine level (1.86 mg/dL vs 1.72 mg/dL; P = .004), and lower mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (55.64 mL/min vs 58.01 mL/min; P = .003) at 1 to 6 months’ follow-up. Compared with the faricimab cohort, the bevacizumab cohort (each n = 3500) showed increased risk of stroke (risk ratio [RR], 1.71, 95% CI, 1.19–2.48), venous thromboembolism (RR, 1.80, 95% CI, 1.11–2.93), myocardial infarction (RR, 1.72, 95% CI, 1.19–2.49), and hypertension (RR, 1.47, 95% CI, 1.19–1.83) within 2 years of follow-up. No significant differences were found between the bevacizumab and ranibizumab cohorts (each n = 2211). Conclusions: Bevacizumab may confer an increased risk of cardiovascular events and differences in renal function parameters compared with aflibercept and faricimab, but not ranibizumab. This underscores the importance of tailoring anti-VEGF therapy to patient-specific profiles, particularly in patients with underlying cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. Further studies in lower-comorbidity populations are needed to clarify these associations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264261484033
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative Analysis of Systemic Complications of Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies in Retinal Diseases

Mirataollah Salabati, Raziyeh Mahmoudzadeh, Adarsh Mallepally, Jessica Randolph et al.
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Comparative Analysis of Systemic Complications of Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies in Retinal Diseases

Mirataollah Salabati, Raziyeh Mahmoudzadeh, Adarsh Mallepally, Jessica Randolph, Michelle Lam, Esha Mittal
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the systemic safety profiles of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents using a large real-world dataset. Methods: The TriNetX Research Network database was used to identify adults with macular edema secondary to diabetes, retinal vein occlusion, or age-related macular degeneration who received bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept (2012–2022) or faricimab (2022–2024). The bevacizumab cohort was matched with the other cohorts using propensity score matching to account for demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Outcomes included stroke, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, hypertension, brain hemorrhage, and renal function. Results: In the propensity score–matched cohorts comparing outcomes between bevacizumab and aflibercept (each n = 9538), bevacizumab was associated with higher mean blood urea nitrogen level (28.07 mg/dL vs 26.89 mg/dL; P = .017), higher mean serum creatinine level (1.86 mg/dL vs 1.72 mg/dL; P = .004), and lower mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (55.64 mL/min vs 58.01 mL/min; P = .003) at 1 to 6 months’ follow-up. Compared with the faricimab cohort, the bevacizumab cohort (each n = 3500) showed increased risk of stroke (risk ratio [RR], 1.71, 95% CI, 1.19–2.48), venous thromboembolism (RR, 1.80, 95% CI, 1.11–2.93), myocardial infarction (RR, 1.72, 95% CI, 1.19–2.49), and hypertension (RR, 1.47, 95% CI, 1.19–1.83) within 2 years of follow-up. No significant differences were found between the bevacizumab and ranibizumab cohorts (each n = 2211). Conclusions: Bevacizumab may confer an increased risk of cardiovascular events and differences in renal function parameters compared with aflibercept and faricimab, but not ranibizumab. This underscores the importance of tailoring anti-VEGF therapy to patient-specific profiles, particularly in patients with underlying cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. Further studies in lower-comorbidity populations are needed to clarify these associations.

Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.