J. N. Findlay’s Rational Mysticism

The philosopher John Niemeyer Findlay (1903–1987) held that the insights of mystical experience can be philosophically analyzed and articulated in rational form. Findlay provided two routes to the “mystical pole of the cosmos.” In the first, he appealed to the related notions of impersonality and impartiality to transcendentally deduce a “firmament of values,” which coalesce into an apical point, the Platonic/Plotinian One or Good. In the second, he again appealed to impersonality/impartiality to argue that the philosophical perplexities of our earthly existence, including the antinomies of space and time, the problem of “other minds,” and the difficulties of ethics and axiology, can be resolved through the positing of a higher world, complementary to and interdependent with our own, where the distinctions between universal and particular, mind and matter, and individual minds, attenuate and eventually dissolve. This higher world culminates in a unique and all-embracing “absolute” that embodies a pure and necessary love and zeal for the highest values, which Findlay equates with the divine. Our world, with its attendant chance, destruction, and evil, is the arena within which these values are actualized, and this actualization completes an “ascent to the absolute” and is an essential component of “the life of God.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17101123
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

J. N. Findlay’s Rational Mysticism

Sanford L. Drob
Religions
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
article

J. N. Findlay’s Rational Mysticism

Sanford L. Drob
article en

Abstract

The philosopher John Niemeyer Findlay (1903–1987) held that the insights of mystical experience can be philosophically analyzed and articulated in rational form. Findlay provided two routes to the “mystical pole of the cosmos.” In the first, he appealed to the related notions of impersonality and impartiality to transcendentally deduce a “firmament of values,” which coalesce into an apical point, the Platonic/Plotinian One or Good. In the second, he again appealed to impersonality/impartiality to argue that the philosophical perplexities of our earthly existence, including the antinomies of space and time, the problem of “other minds,” and the difficulties of ethics and axiology, can be resolved through the positing of a higher world, complementary to and interdependent with our own, where the distinctions between universal and particular, mind and matter, and individual minds, attenuate and eventually dissolve. This higher world culminates in a unique and all-embracing “absolute” that embodies a pure and necessary love and zeal for the highest values, which Findlay equates with the divine. Our world, with its attendant chance, destruction, and evil, is the arena within which these values are actualized, and this actualization completes an “ascent to the absolute” and is an essential component of “the life of God.”

ReligionsVol. 17(10)
Fielding Graduate University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.