Modularity-based approach identifies small sets of control nodes in synthetic and biological Boolean networks

This study investigates the problem of controlling the dynamics of biological systems to achieve desired outcomes (attractors). Specifically, we describe biological systems with Boolean models, which represent the system as a network, characterize system components (nodes) with binary states, and use discrete functions to describe the state changes of the nodes due to their interactions. We build upon the Feedback Vertex Set (FVS) theory, which guarantees that controlling the nodes in an FVS can drive the system toward a target attractor. However, FVS control can be computationally expensive in large networks. To overcome this, we propose two methods that exploit modularity within networks: (1) selecting the top 10% of influential nodes in each module based on structural metrics, and (2) identifying a subset of the FVS by prioritizing the highest-ranked nodes within each module. These approaches are evaluated in synthetic Random Boolean Networks (RBNs) and validated on real biological Boolean models. Our results show that modular control strategies are more efficient than global approaches, particularly in networks with clear modular structures, which is pertinent for controlling biological systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48763-1
Primary Topic
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Modularity-based approach identifies small sets of control nodes in synthetic and biological Boolean networks

Réka Albert, Eli Newby, Fatemeh Sadat Fatemi Nasrollahi
Scientific Reports
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
article

Modularity-based approach identifies small sets of control nodes in synthetic and biological Boolean networks

Réka Albert, Eli Newby, Fatemeh Sadat Fatemi Nasrollahi
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the problem of controlling the dynamics of biological systems to achieve desired outcomes (attractors). Specifically, we describe biological systems with Boolean models, which represent the system as a network, characterize system components (nodes) with binary states, and use discrete functions to describe the state changes of the nodes due to their interactions. We build upon the Feedback Vertex Set (FVS) theory, which guarantees that controlling the nodes in an FVS can drive the system toward a target attractor. However, FVS control can be computationally expensive in large networks. To overcome this, we propose two methods that exploit modularity within networks: (1) selecting the top 10% of influential nodes in each module based on structural metrics, and (2) identifying a subset of the FVS by prioritizing the highest-ranked nodes within each module. These approaches are evaluated in synthetic Random Boolean Networks (RBNs) and validated on real biological Boolean models. Our results show that modular control strategies are more efficient than global approaches, particularly in networks with clear modular structures, which is pertinent for controlling biological systems.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modularity-based approach identifies small sets of control nodes in synthetic and biological Boolean networks — Réka Albert, Eli Newby, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS