Disability Representation in Social and Personality Psychology Research: A State-of-the-Art Review

We conducted a systematic state-of-the-art review examining disability representation of three flagship social and personality psychology journals between 2017 and 2022. First, we examined the 2,343 articles published in that time frame and found that 192 (8.19%) of them used at least one instance of disability-related terminology. Second, we examined patterns of disability-related terminology use and found that these concepts were most often used extraneously (e.g., in parenthetical phrases). Only 3 (0.13%) articles were primarily focused on disability. This is the first systematic investigation to examine how and to what extent social and personality psychology research addresses topics related to disability. These findings highlight a need for substantive change in the representation of disability within social and personality psychology. We close with recommendations for researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261480179
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Disability Representation in Social and Personality Psychology Research: A State-of-the-Art Review

Brandon L. Boring, Felix Y. Wu, Kathleen R. Bogart, Alyssa Hillary Zisk et al.
1 citations
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Disability Rights and Representation
5.82
article

Disability Representation in Social and Personality Psychology Research: A State-of-the-Art Review

Brandon L. Boring, Felix Y. Wu, Kathleen R. Bogart, Alyssa Hillary Zisk, Rachel A. VanDaalen, Kyle Anderson, Jennifer Grace Pearlstein, Jordan Rubin‐McGregor, Bridget Klest, Payton D. Rule, Katie Wang, Jessica L. McManus, William B. Meese, Emily F. Plackowski, S. Mason Garrison, Ian Moura, Tory G. Benson, Zofia Danae Cuenco, Samantha R. Van Doren
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We conducted a systematic state-of-the-art review examining disability representation of three flagship social and personality psychology journals between 2017 and 2022. First, we examined the 2,343 articles published in that time frame and found that 192 (8.19%) of them used at least one instance of disability-related terminology. Second, we examined patterns of disability-related terminology use and found that these concepts were most often used extraneously (e.g., in parenthetical phrases). Only 3 (0.13%) articles were primarily focused on disability. This is the first systematic investigation to examine how and to what extent social and personality psychology research addresses topics related to disability. These findings highlight a need for substantive change in the representation of disability within social and personality psychology. We close with recommendations for researchers.

Social Psychological and Personality Science
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Boston College (US), The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), Oregon State University (US), Kent State University (US), University of California, Merced (US), University of Rhode Island (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Yale University (US), University of Oxford (GB), Human Resources Research Organization (US), Wake Forest University (US), Brandeis University (US), Miami University (US), Hood College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Disability Rights and Representation
5.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.