The Figure-of-4 Maneuver: Quantitative Characterization of Lateral Compartment Behavior During Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction Conventional intraoperative gap assessment is performed in standardized reference positions that do not replicate many functional postures patients assume during daily activities. Physiologic lateral compartment opening becomes most apparent in postures combining flexion, hip external rotation, and relative varus alignment, such as sitting cross-legged, and shoe or sock application. The Figure-of-4 position reproduces this combination intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to describe the Figure-of-4 maneuver as an intraoperative positional assessment during robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and quantitatively characterize compartment behavior during its execution using standardized robotic measurements. Materials and Methods Eighty-three consecutive primary rTKAs performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. After bone preparation and balancing, with trial components in situ, each knee underwent conventional and Figure-of-4 assessment. The VELYS standardized robotic measurement framework was used for both conditions; only limb posture differed. Compartment behavior was expressed as the medial-to-lateral gap difference (ΔML; medial minus lateral) in flexion and extension. Conventional and Figure-of-4 ΔML were compared within each knee using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was correlated with the change in ΔML using Pearson and Spearman coefficients. Results Figure-of-4 assessment produced consistently more negative flexion ΔML than conventional assessment (mean difference −2.181 mm; 95% CI −2.414 to −1.947; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.039). Extension ΔML did not differ significantly (mean difference 0.080 mm; 95% CI −0.019 to 0.178; p = 0.113). Preoperative HKA angle did not correlate with the change in flexion ΔML (r = 0.091, p = 0.416) or extension ΔML (r = −0.111, p = 0.318). Conclusion Figure-of-4 assessment consistently demonstrated greater lateral compartment opening in flexion than conventional assessment, while extension measurements remained essentially unchanged. The standardized robotic measurement framework enabled objective quantification of compartment behavior in a positional condition not evaluated during routine assessment. The maneuver characterizes behavior of the prepared knee in a posture associated with common activities of daily living and provides information complementary to conventional assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Knee Surgery
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2968-6106
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Figure-of-4 Maneuver: Quantitative Characterization of Lateral Compartment Behavior During Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty

Ravi Chandra Vattipalli, Varoon Chand Palakodety
The Journal of Knee Surgery
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

The Figure-of-4 Maneuver: Quantitative Characterization of Lateral Compartment Behavior During Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty

Ravi Chandra Vattipalli, Varoon Chand Palakodety
article en

Abstract

Introduction Conventional intraoperative gap assessment is performed in standardized reference positions that do not replicate many functional postures patients assume during daily activities. Physiologic lateral compartment opening becomes most apparent in postures combining flexion, hip external rotation, and relative varus alignment, such as sitting cross-legged, and shoe or sock application. The Figure-of-4 position reproduces this combination intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to describe the Figure-of-4 maneuver as an intraoperative positional assessment during robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and quantitatively characterize compartment behavior during its execution using standardized robotic measurements. Materials and Methods Eighty-three consecutive primary rTKAs performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. After bone preparation and balancing, with trial components in situ, each knee underwent conventional and Figure-of-4 assessment. The VELYS standardized robotic measurement framework was used for both conditions; only limb posture differed. Compartment behavior was expressed as the medial-to-lateral gap difference (ΔML; medial minus lateral) in flexion and extension. Conventional and Figure-of-4 ΔML were compared within each knee using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was correlated with the change in ΔML using Pearson and Spearman coefficients. Results Figure-of-4 assessment produced consistently more negative flexion ΔML than conventional assessment (mean difference −2.181 mm; 95% CI −2.414 to −1.947; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.039). Extension ΔML did not differ significantly (mean difference 0.080 mm; 95% CI −0.019 to 0.178; p = 0.113). Preoperative HKA angle did not correlate with the change in flexion ΔML (r = 0.091, p = 0.416) or extension ΔML (r = −0.111, p = 0.318). Conclusion Figure-of-4 assessment consistently demonstrated greater lateral compartment opening in flexion than conventional assessment, while extension measurements remained essentially unchanged. The standardized robotic measurement framework enabled objective quantification of compartment behavior in a positional condition not evaluated during routine assessment. The maneuver characterizes behavior of the prepared knee in a posture associated with common activities of daily living and provides information complementary to conventional assessment.

The Journal of Knee Surgery
CARE Hospitals (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.