Differences in rainfall interception loss between beech and oak forest stands in a Mediterranean mountain catchment
Canopy interception is a key component of forest hydrology, influencing soil moisture and water availability. This study quantified throughfall and stemflow in beech (Fagus sylvatica) and oak (Quercus robur) stands on opposing slopes within a 44 km2 Mediterranean mountain catchment in central Italy. Over nearly three years, more than 200 precipitation events were monitored in four plots. Relative interception loss averaged 38.7% in oak and 30.6% in beech stands during moderate events. Despite higher canopy cover and leaf area index (LAI) in beech, oak showed greater interception across growing (42.2% vs. 33.2%) and dormant (32.5% vs. 26.0%) seasons. This contrast persisted under leaf-off conditions, when LAI converged between species, indicating that interception is governed by canopy properties beyond leaf area. An adapted LAI-based analytical model systematically underestimated observed losses and failed to reproduce the oak-beech difference. Interception thus emerges from the coupled control of canopy structure and local energy availability.
Authors
- Daniele Penna (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-0697)
- Christian Massari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0983-1276)
- Silvia Barbetta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-3209)
- Marco Donnini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7270-7783)
- Matteo Verdone (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6239-5334)
- Marco Dionigi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-7175)
- Paolo Filippucci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-589X)
- Domenico De Santis
- Thomas Holmes
- Diego G. Miralles
Institutions
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US)
- Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Published
- 2026-09-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2026.2740191
- Primary Topic
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00