Temporal and Spatial Associations of L-Band Fully Polarimetric SAR Metrics with Soil Moisture over a Wet Volcanic Ash Soil Field

L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) offers repeated observations of soil moisture, but its ability to track field-averaged changes and within-field differences under wet conditions requires separate assessment. We compared 21 fully polarimetric ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 acquisitions with time-domain reflectometry (TDR) observations at 12 locations in a short-grass volcanic ash soil field. Field-averaged volumetric water content (VWC) ranged from 0.23 to 0.54 cm3 cm−3 and exceeded 0.30 cm3 cm−3 on 17 acquisition dates. On the 19 dates common to all metrics, VV backscatter and the Freeman–Durden surface component showed comparable temporal associations with VWC (Pearson r = 0.72 and 0.71; Spearman ρ = 0.71 and 0.69, respectively). Their dependent correlations did not differ detectably (p = 0.923). In contrast, within-date spatial correlations varied substantially across dates, and reducing or omitting the backscatter and Pauli filtering windows did not produce consistent correspondence with the observed within-field VWC differences. The Improved Integral Equation Model (IIEM), driven by TDR-derived permittivity, reproduced VV more closely than HH and HV: baseline model–observation RMSEs were 1.41, 4.40, and 25.5 dB, respectively. This ordering persisted across the evaluated roughness range, while varying the assumed loss tangent had negligible influence. These results support VV as a comparatively simple indicator of field-averaged temporal soil moisture variation under predominantly wet conditions, with Freeman-S providing complementary component-level information. The IIEM comparison supports a dielectric surface-scattering contribution to VV, whereas the weak VWC association and large model discrepancy of HV indicate limited usefulness for temporal moisture monitoring at this site. Field-averaged temporal sensitivity should be distinguished from the ability to represent fine-scale spatial moisture patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18193316
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Temporal and Spatial Associations of L-Band Fully Polarimetric SAR Metrics with Soil Moisture over a Wet Volcanic Ash Soil Field

Kosuke Noborio, Shinsuke Aoki, Daiki Kobayashi, Naoto Sato et al.
Remote Sensing
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
article

Temporal and Spatial Associations of L-Band Fully Polarimetric SAR Metrics with Soil Moisture over a Wet Volcanic Ash Soil Field

Kosuke Noborio, Shinsuke Aoki, Daiki Kobayashi, Naoto Sato, Maiko Kawaguchi
article en

Abstract

L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) offers repeated observations of soil moisture, but its ability to track field-averaged changes and within-field differences under wet conditions requires separate assessment. We compared 21 fully polarimetric ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 acquisitions with time-domain reflectometry (TDR) observations at 12 locations in a short-grass volcanic ash soil field. Field-averaged volumetric water content (VWC) ranged from 0.23 to 0.54 cm3 cm−3 and exceeded 0.30 cm3 cm−3 on 17 acquisition dates. On the 19 dates common to all metrics, VV backscatter and the Freeman–Durden surface component showed comparable temporal associations with VWC (Pearson r = 0.72 and 0.71; Spearman ρ = 0.71 and 0.69, respectively). Their dependent correlations did not differ detectably (p = 0.923). In contrast, within-date spatial correlations varied substantially across dates, and reducing or omitting the backscatter and Pauli filtering windows did not produce consistent correspondence with the observed within-field VWC differences. The Improved Integral Equation Model (IIEM), driven by TDR-derived permittivity, reproduced VV more closely than HH and HV: baseline model–observation RMSEs were 1.41, 4.40, and 25.5 dB, respectively. This ordering persisted across the evaluated roughness range, while varying the assumed loss tangent had negligible influence. These results support VV as a comparatively simple indicator of field-averaged temporal soil moisture variation under predominantly wet conditions, with Freeman-S providing complementary component-level information. The IIEM comparison supports a dielectric surface-scattering contribution to VV, whereas the weak VWC association and large model discrepancy of HV indicate limited usefulness for temporal moisture monitoring at this site. Field-averaged temporal sensitivity should be distinguished from the ability to represent fine-scale spatial moisture patterns.

Remote SensingVol. 18(19)
Meiji University (JP), Kagawa University (JP), NTT (Japan) (JP), Hokkai Gakuen University (JP)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.