Mode as Differentiating Principle of Virtue: The Example of Humility and Magnanimity

Abstract: Thomas Aquinas distinguishes the cardinal virtues not only by their subjects—the powers of the soul that each virtue perfects—but also by the modi of moral virtue. The modi are more operative as a principle of division in the Secunda secundae. I show both that the modes are quasi-formal principles of moral virtue as such, and yet that the moral virtues are distinguished according to the predominance of one of these four modes over the others. I focus on the modes of curbing (refrenatio or moderatio) and strengthening (firmitas) particularly, arguing that the former consists in a rational measure in the sense appetite whereas the latter consists in the very stability or steadfastness of the sense appetite already measured by curbing. I end by considering Aquinas's division of humility and magnanimity in light of his account of the modes, arguing that humility exhibits the predominant mode of curbing in restraining the passion of hope, whereas magnanimity exhibits the predominant mode of strengthening in rendering the sense appetite steadfast against despair.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2026.a1002001
Primary Topic
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Mode as Differentiating Principle of Virtue: The Example of Humility and Magnanimity

Juraj Nevjestic
The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
article

Mode as Differentiating Principle of Virtue: The Example of Humility and Magnanimity

Juraj Nevjestic
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Thomas Aquinas distinguishes the cardinal virtues not only by their subjects—the powers of the soul that each virtue perfects—but also by the modi of moral virtue. The modi are more operative as a principle of division in the Secunda secundae. I show both that the modes are quasi-formal principles of moral virtue as such, and yet that the moral virtues are distinguished according to the predominance of one of these four modes over the others. I focus on the modes of curbing (refrenatio or moderatio) and strengthening (firmitas) particularly, arguing that the former consists in a rational measure in the sense appetite whereas the latter consists in the very stability or steadfastness of the sense appetite already measured by curbing. I end by considering Aquinas's division of humility and magnanimity in light of his account of the modes, arguing that humility exhibits the predominant mode of curbing in restraining the passion of hope, whereas magnanimity exhibits the predominant mode of strengthening in rendering the sense appetite steadfast against despair.

The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly ReviewVol. 90(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.