Acute toxicity and patient-reported quality of life during daily online adaptive radiotherapy versus conventional IGRT for localized prostate cancer: a prospective parallel cohort study

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to prospectively compare clinician-reported acute toxicity and patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between daily cone-beam CT (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with moderate hypofractionation. Materials and methods In this prospective study, 74 patients with localized prostate cancer received either CBCT-based oART ( n = 43) or CBCT-based IGRT ( n = 31) with 62/57.6/48 Gy in 20 fractions, allocated pragmatically by convenience. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was assessed weekly using CTCAE v5.0, and HRQoL was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline and the end of therapy. Between-group differences were tested using Boschloo’s exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and t -tests; temporal and between-group changes were evaluated based on minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs). Results Baseline patient and treatment characteristics were similar, except for more high-/very high-risk tumors in the oART group (40.5% vs. 9.7%; p = 0.03). Online ART was associated with more favorable gastrointestinal toxicity, reflected by lower maximum toxicity grades ( p = 0.028). Maximum genitourinary toxicity was comparable between groups ( p = 0.793). More IGRT patients exceeded MCID thresholds for fatigue (74% vs. 37%; p = 0.004), physical functioning (27% vs. 3%; p = 0.009), and role functioning (48.1% vs. 22.9%; p = 0.04). Differences for global health, pain, social function, and diarrhea were not statistically significant but consistently favored oART. Conclusion Daily CBCT-based oART and IGRT were both well tolerated, with low rates of high-grade acute toxicity. In this exploratory analysis, oART was associated with a more favorable GI toxicity profile and better preservation of HRQoL. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest that adaptive workflows may provide measurable patient-centered benefits during prostate radiotherapy and warrant confirmation in larger prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-026-02596-z
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Acute toxicity and patient-reported quality of life during daily online adaptive radiotherapy versus conventional IGRT for localized prostate cancer: a prospective parallel cohort study

Daniel Zips, Thomas Wiegel, Kerstin Rubarth, Luise A. Künzel et al.
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Acute toxicity and patient-reported quality of life during daily online adaptive radiotherapy versus conventional IGRT for localized prostate cancer: a prospective parallel cohort study

Daniel Zips, Thomas Wiegel, Kerstin Rubarth, Luise A. Künzel, Goda Kalinauskaitė, Reinhard Thamm, Julia Bauer, Senger Carolin, Jakob Dannehl, Arne Grün, Marcus Beck, Celina Höhne
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to prospectively compare clinician-reported acute toxicity and patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between daily cone-beam CT (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with moderate hypofractionation. Materials and methods In this prospective study, 74 patients with localized prostate cancer received either CBCT-based oART ( n = 43) or CBCT-based IGRT ( n = 31) with 62/57.6/48 Gy in 20 fractions, allocated pragmatically by convenience. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was assessed weekly using CTCAE v5.0, and HRQoL was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline and the end of therapy. Between-group differences were tested using Boschloo’s exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and t -tests; temporal and between-group changes were evaluated based on minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs). Results Baseline patient and treatment characteristics were similar, except for more high-/very high-risk tumors in the oART group (40.5% vs. 9.7%; p = 0.03). Online ART was associated with more favorable gastrointestinal toxicity, reflected by lower maximum toxicity grades ( p = 0.028). Maximum genitourinary toxicity was comparable between groups ( p = 0.793). More IGRT patients exceeded MCID thresholds for fatigue (74% vs. 37%; p = 0.004), physical functioning (27% vs. 3%; p = 0.009), and role functioning (48.1% vs. 22.9%; p = 0.04). Differences for global health, pain, social function, and diarrhea were not statistically significant but consistently favored oART. Conclusion Daily CBCT-based oART and IGRT were both well tolerated, with low rates of high-grade acute toxicity. In this exploratory analysis, oART was associated with a more favorable GI toxicity profile and better preservation of HRQoL. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest that adaptive workflows may provide measurable patient-centered benefits during prostate radiotherapy and warrant confirmation in larger prospective studies.

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.