Improving Handover From Intensive Care Units to Surgical Wards Using a Standardized Patient Handover Process: A Prospective Clinical Quality Improvement and Implementation Study

ABSTRACT Background Poor handovers from ICU to general surgical wards cause communication and teamworking challenges, loss of information, readmission to the ICU within 48 h and increased hospital stay and may result in unexpected death. Aims The primary aim of this research was to evaluate the effects of implementing a standardized patient handover process, supported by a structured handover checklist, on postoperative handovers from the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) to surgical wards among nurses. The secondary aim was to evaluate nurses' perceptions of the acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of the standardized handover process. Study Design This study was conducted in the general surgery ICU (SICU) and the general surgical ward of a 900‐bed public hospital in Türkiye. A total of 100 patient handovers from the SICU to the ward were observed (50 pre‐implementation, 50 post‐implementation). Following pre‐implementation data collection, nurses received training on the standardized handover process. Nurses completed validated implementation outcome surveys at 1‐ and 10‐month post‐implementation to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of the handover standardization; they also completed a satisfaction questionnaire administered 1‐month post‐implementation. Results A total of 39 nurses participated in the study. Following implementation of the standardized handover, coverage of patient care elements increased, with the largest and statistically significant improvements with significant improvements in patient identification and drain/catheter information ( p < 0.001). Handover duration increased, but the difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.051). Interruptions were observed in 50% of handovers before implementation and in 48% of handovers after implementation. Nurses reported high satisfaction with the standardized handover process and perceived implementability—including acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness—was high at both 1‐ and 10‐month post‐implementation. Conclusions The implementation of a standardized patient handover process improved information transfer and was perceived as satisfactory, acceptable, feasible and appropriate by nurses. Relevance to Clinical Practice This study is relevant to clinical practice as it presents a newly developed, effective and implementable SICU‐to‐ward handover strategy for nurses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing in Critical Care
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70703
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Improving Handover From Intensive Care Units to Surgical Wards Using a Standardized Patient Handover Process: A Prospective Clinical Quality Improvement and Implementation Study

Fatma Nair Aktaş, Mandeep Sekhon, Nick Sevdalis, Ebru Önler et al.
Nursing in Critical Care
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

Improving Handover From Intensive Care Units to Surgical Wards Using a Standardized Patient Handover Process: A Prospective Clinical Quality Improvement and Implementation Study

Fatma Nair Aktaş, Mandeep Sekhon, Nick Sevdalis, Ebru Önler, Louise Hull
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Poor handovers from ICU to general surgical wards cause communication and teamworking challenges, loss of information, readmission to the ICU within 48 h and increased hospital stay and may result in unexpected death. Aims The primary aim of this research was to evaluate the effects of implementing a standardized patient handover process, supported by a structured handover checklist, on postoperative handovers from the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) to surgical wards among nurses. The secondary aim was to evaluate nurses' perceptions of the acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of the standardized handover process. Study Design This study was conducted in the general surgery ICU (SICU) and the general surgical ward of a 900‐bed public hospital in Türkiye. A total of 100 patient handovers from the SICU to the ward were observed (50 pre‐implementation, 50 post‐implementation). Following pre‐implementation data collection, nurses received training on the standardized handover process. Nurses completed validated implementation outcome surveys at 1‐ and 10‐month post‐implementation to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of the handover standardization; they also completed a satisfaction questionnaire administered 1‐month post‐implementation. Results A total of 39 nurses participated in the study. Following implementation of the standardized handover, coverage of patient care elements increased, with the largest and statistically significant improvements with significant improvements in patient identification and drain/catheter information ( p < 0.001). Handover duration increased, but the difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.051). Interruptions were observed in 50% of handovers before implementation and in 48% of handovers after implementation. Nurses reported high satisfaction with the standardized handover process and perceived implementability—including acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness—was high at both 1‐ and 10‐month post‐implementation. Conclusions The implementation of a standardized patient handover process improved information transfer and was perceived as satisfactory, acceptable, feasible and appropriate by nurses. Relevance to Clinical Practice This study is relevant to clinical practice as it presents a newly developed, effective and implementable SICU‐to‐ward handover strategy for nurses.

Nursing in Critical CareVol. 31(6)
Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University (TR), University of Leicester (GB), St George's, University of London (GB), National University of Singapore (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.