Dimensions of Military Neurotrauma: Factor Structure and Clinical Correlates of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury–Lifetime

OBJECTIVE: To examine the dimensional structure of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime (BAT-L) and evaluate whether derived injury dimensions are associated with neurobehavioral symptoms and functional disability in post-9/11 US military veterans and service members. SETTING: VA Medical Centers in Boston, MA and Houston, TX, within the Translational Research Center for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Stress Disorders study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 752 post-9/11 veterans and service members with deployment history were included: 570 in the Boston exploratory sample and 182 in the Houston confirmatory sample. DESIGN: This observational, cross-sectional analysis of baseline cohort data used exploratory factor analysis in the Boston sample followed by confirmatory factor analysis in the independent Houston sample. Confirmatory factor analysis-derived factor scores from the combined sample were examined in relation to clinical outcomes. MAIN MEASURES: Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime (lifetime history of TBI and blast exposures); Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory; World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II. Adjusted models controlled for post-traumatic stress disorder and depressive symptom severity. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 clinically interpretable factors: Blast Exposure (Blast-Exp), Military Blast TBI (MBlast-TBI), Military Blunt TBI (MBlunt-TBI), and Civilian TBI (Civilian-TBI). The confirmatory factor analysis supported this structure in the Houston sample. After adjustment, MBlast-TBI showed the broadest associations with Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory symptom burden and functional disability. MBlunt-TBI was associated with somatic symptoms and functional disability, whereas Civilian-TBI was associated only with affective symptoms. Blast-Exp was not significantly associated with either outcome. CONCLUSION: The BAT-L demonstrates a replicable and clinically meaningful factor structure that distinguishes blast exposure frequency from blast-related TBI severity and separates military and civilian injury contexts. These findings support the BAT-L's utility for dimensional characterization of lifetime neurotrauma and for future studies examining clinical and biological correlates of distinct TBI profiles.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/htr.0000000000001212
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Dimensions of Military Neurotrauma: Factor Structure and Clinical Correlates of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury–Lifetime

Alyssa Currao, Audri Villalon, Adam Lebas, Ruosha Li et al.
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Dimensions of Military Neurotrauma: Factor Structure and Clinical Correlates of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury–Lifetime

Alyssa Currao, Audri Villalon, Adam Lebas, Ruosha Li, Ricardo E. Jorge, Catherine B. Fortier, Jennifer Fonda, William P. Milberg
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the dimensional structure of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime (BAT-L) and evaluate whether derived injury dimensions are associated with neurobehavioral symptoms and functional disability in post-9/11 US military veterans and service members. SETTING: VA Medical Centers in Boston, MA and Houston, TX, within the Translational Research Center for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Stress Disorders study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 752 post-9/11 veterans and service members with deployment history were included: 570 in the Boston exploratory sample and 182 in the Houston confirmatory sample. DESIGN: This observational, cross-sectional analysis of baseline cohort data used exploratory factor analysis in the Boston sample followed by confirmatory factor analysis in the independent Houston sample. Confirmatory factor analysis-derived factor scores from the combined sample were examined in relation to clinical outcomes. MAIN MEASURES: Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime (lifetime history of TBI and blast exposures); Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory; World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II. Adjusted models controlled for post-traumatic stress disorder and depressive symptom severity. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 clinically interpretable factors: Blast Exposure (Blast-Exp), Military Blast TBI (MBlast-TBI), Military Blunt TBI (MBlunt-TBI), and Civilian TBI (Civilian-TBI). The confirmatory factor analysis supported this structure in the Houston sample. After adjustment, MBlast-TBI showed the broadest associations with Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory symptom burden and functional disability. MBlunt-TBI was associated with somatic symptoms and functional disability, whereas Civilian-TBI was associated only with affective symptoms. Blast-Exp was not significantly associated with either outcome. CONCLUSION: The BAT-L demonstrates a replicable and clinically meaningful factor structure that distinguishes blast exposure frequency from blast-related TBI severity and separates military and civilian injury contexts. These findings support the BAT-L's utility for dimensional characterization of lifetime neurotrauma and for future studies examining clinical and biological correlates of distinct TBI profiles.

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.