Career Decisional Procrastination Questionnaire: Construction and Initial Validation

Career decisional procrastination (CDP) is commonly conceptualized as a unidimensional, maladaptive tendency to delay career decisions. This approach overlooks that individuals may delay career decisions for different reasons. This research developed and initially validated the Career Decisional Procrastination Questionnaire (CDPQ), a multidimensional measure of five underlying reasons for career decisional procrastination: short-term rewards , self-worth protection, lack of psychological resources , pressure thriving , and strategic timing . The CDPQ was examined in two Hebrew-speaking Israeli samples ( N = 240; N = 243) and one English-speaking U.S. sample ( N = 322). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the five-factor structure. The CDPQ demonstrated incremental validity beyond unidimensional measures in predicting career decision distress and career commitment making, and, in the Hebrew-speaking sample, career decision status. Lack of psychological resources , self-worth protection , and short-term rewards generally showed positive associations with maladaptive indicators, including career decision distress, decision rumination, and career decision ambiguity aversion. Pressure thriving and strategic timing showed a more complex pattern: both were positively associated with the harnessing dimension of psychological flexibility, whereas strategic timing showed less consistently adaptive associations. Findings support a multidimensional understanding of CDP and highlight the value of assessing reasons for delay to inform research and career counseling practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Career Assessment
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727261490496
Primary Topic
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Career Decisional Procrastination Questionnaire: Construction and Initial Validation

Ruth Butler, Yuliya Lipshits‐Braziler, Shada Kashkoush
Journal of Career Assessment
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
article

Career Decisional Procrastination Questionnaire: Construction and Initial Validation

Ruth Butler, Yuliya Lipshits‐Braziler, Shada Kashkoush
article en

Abstract

Career decisional procrastination (CDP) is commonly conceptualized as a unidimensional, maladaptive tendency to delay career decisions. This approach overlooks that individuals may delay career decisions for different reasons. This research developed and initially validated the Career Decisional Procrastination Questionnaire (CDPQ), a multidimensional measure of five underlying reasons for career decisional procrastination: short-term rewards , self-worth protection, lack of psychological resources , pressure thriving , and strategic timing . The CDPQ was examined in two Hebrew-speaking Israeli samples ( N = 240; N = 243) and one English-speaking U.S. sample ( N = 322). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the five-factor structure. The CDPQ demonstrated incremental validity beyond unidimensional measures in predicting career decision distress and career commitment making, and, in the Hebrew-speaking sample, career decision status. Lack of psychological resources , self-worth protection , and short-term rewards generally showed positive associations with maladaptive indicators, including career decision distress, decision rumination, and career decision ambiguity aversion. Pressure thriving and strategic timing showed a more complex pattern: both were positively associated with the harnessing dimension of psychological flexibility, whereas strategic timing showed less consistently adaptive associations. Findings support a multidimensional understanding of CDP and highlight the value of assessing reasons for delay to inform research and career counseling practice.

Journal of Career Assessment
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.