Delegated, but Not Authorized: The question multi-agent systems have not been asking

Work in a multi-agent system crosses three kinds of boundaries: between the stages of one workflow, between different workflows inside one company, and between companies. Considerable effort is devoted to assessing the quality of multi-agent output, but far less to a question institutions learned long ago to ask before relying on the work: was this actor authorized to transfer this work to that actor? Multi-agent systems depend on delegation. Orchestration agents assign tasks, specialist agents produce work, consumer agents act on it, and work changes hands repeatedly with little human oversight. This paper makes the case that transfer authorization is distinct from access control and output quality. We identify five failure patterns that quality checks do not catch and five properties that safe transfer authorization systems need to address them. Authorization matters at all three boundaries, especially when agents in one company transfer work to agents in another. Our examples come from semiconductor design and manufacturing, although the problem applies across industries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22958165
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Delegated, but Not Authorized: The question multi-agent systems have not been asking

Michael Luciano
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
preprint

Delegated, but Not Authorized: The question multi-agent systems have not been asking

Michael Luciano
preprint en

Abstract

Work in a multi-agent system crosses three kinds of boundaries: between the stages of one workflow, between different workflows inside one company, and between companies. Considerable effort is devoted to assessing the quality of multi-agent output, but far less to a question institutions learned long ago to ask before relying on the work: was this actor authorized to transfer this work to that actor? Multi-agent systems depend on delegation. Orchestration agents assign tasks, specialist agents produce work, consumer agents act on it, and work changes hands repeatedly with little human oversight. This paper makes the case that transfer authorization is distinct from access control and output quality. We identify five failure patterns that quality checks do not catch and five properties that safe transfer authorization systems need to address them. Authorization matters at all three boundaries, especially when agents in one company transfer work to agents in another. Our examples come from semiconductor design and manufacturing, although the problem applies across industries.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Delegated, but Not Authorized: The question multi-agent systems have not been asking — Michael Luciano · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS