How was the North China Craton destroyed: a review of models and observations

The North China Craton represents a geological paradox: cratons are generally considered stable and long-lived (>1 Ga), but several lines of evidence suggest that it underwent prolonged Mesozoic destabilization, with peak lithospheric removal during the Late Jurassic to mid-Cretaceous (~160–110 Ma), including voluminous lithospheric removal and tectonic deformation. This overview summarizes geodynamic modelling studies constrained by geophysical, petrological, and geological observations to investigate the potential mechanisms responsible for the Mesozoic deformation/destruction of the North China Craton. We first provide a summary of geological observations, including magmatism and tectonics, pertaining to lithospheric removal, before analysing the proposed geodynamic models. We organize the reviewed mechanisms into primary drivers (lithospheric delamination, flat-slab subduction, big mantle wedge) and secondary modifying processes (back-arc extension, convective erosion). Subsequently, key geodynamic processes, including lithospheric delamination (slab peel-back) along mid-lithospheric discontinuities, flat-slab and big mantle wedge subduction, back-arc extension, and convective erosion, are discussed to explain the removal of the cratonic lithosphere under the North China region. By synthesizing models and observations, this review aims to address first-order parameters that can control gaps in de-cratonisation processes, which may be applicable to other cratonic areas around the globe. These results provide future directions in tectonic modelling of cratonic lithosphere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Geology Review
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2026.2727598
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

How was the North China Craton destroyed: a review of models and observations

Ebru Şengül, Açelya Ballı, Oğuz H. Göğüş, Jeroen van Hunen
International Geology Review
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

How was the North China Craton destroyed: a review of models and observations

Ebru Şengül, Açelya Ballı, Oğuz H. Göğüş, Jeroen van Hunen
article en

Abstract

The North China Craton represents a geological paradox: cratons are generally considered stable and long-lived (>1 Ga), but several lines of evidence suggest that it underwent prolonged Mesozoic destabilization, with peak lithospheric removal during the Late Jurassic to mid-Cretaceous (~160–110 Ma), including voluminous lithospheric removal and tectonic deformation. This overview summarizes geodynamic modelling studies constrained by geophysical, petrological, and geological observations to investigate the potential mechanisms responsible for the Mesozoic deformation/destruction of the North China Craton. We first provide a summary of geological observations, including magmatism and tectonics, pertaining to lithospheric removal, before analysing the proposed geodynamic models. We organize the reviewed mechanisms into primary drivers (lithospheric delamination, flat-slab subduction, big mantle wedge) and secondary modifying processes (back-arc extension, convective erosion). Subsequently, key geodynamic processes, including lithospheric delamination (slab peel-back) along mid-lithospheric discontinuities, flat-slab and big mantle wedge subduction, back-arc extension, and convective erosion, are discussed to explain the removal of the cratonic lithosphere under the North China region. By synthesizing models and observations, this review aims to address first-order parameters that can control gaps in de-cratonisation processes, which may be applicable to other cratonic areas around the globe. These results provide future directions in tectonic modelling of cratonic lithosphere.

International Geology Review
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR), Durham University (GB), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How was the North China Craton destroyed: a review of models and observations — Ebru Şengül, Açelya Ballı, et al. · International Geology Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS