Quantitative Structure Modeling of Excavated Stump-Root Systems from Terrestrial Laser Scanning Point Clouds: Formulation and Destructive Validation in Pinus taeda

Belowground biomass (BGB) is an important component of forest carbon stocks but remains poorly quantified owing to the difficulty of measuring it directly. This study evaluated terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) combined with quantitative structure models (QSM) to estimate root volume, biomass and carbon in Pinus taeda. Twelve root systems were excavated, washed, weighed and scanned, then reconstructed using a TreeQSM formulation adapted for stump-root systems. Volume was converted to biomass using mean and diameter class-specific basic density, and to carbon using measured carbon contents. QSM-derived volume showed weak-to-moderate agreement with measured volume (A = 0.6292; CC1 = 0.3916; d = 0.6692), with a systematic underestimation of 43.6%. BGB estimates using mean density showed comparable agreement (A = 0.7339; bias 37.9%), while diameter class-specific densities slightly reduced it (A = 0.7126; bias 40.7%). Basic density was lowest in the finest and highest in the coarsest class (0.224–0.298 g·cm−3), whereas carbon content varied only slightly among classes (43.73–44.62%). Belowground carbon showed agreement comparable to BGB and higher than volume (A = 0.7093–0.7308; bias 37.9–40.7%), with no gain from class-specific carbon contents. A single mean density was sufficient to estimate BGB. This simplification is appropriate as long as the error in volume estimation is greater than the error introduced by using a mean density, but this may change as reconstruction methods improve. In addition, the method requires root systems to be excavated and does not allow the assessment of roots in situ.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f17101151
Primary Topic
Tree Root and Stability Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantitative Structure Modeling of Excavated Stump-Root Systems from Terrestrial Laser Scanning Point Clouds: Formulation and Destructive Validation in Pinus taeda

Ana Paula Dalla Côrte, Tauana de Souza Mangini, Inácio Thomaz Bueno, Álvaro Luís Pasquetti Berghetti et al.
Forests
Tree Root and Stability Studies
article

Quantitative Structure Modeling of Excavated Stump-Root Systems from Terrestrial Laser Scanning Point Clouds: Formulation and Destructive Validation in Pinus taeda

Ana Paula Dalla Côrte, Tauana de Souza Mangini, Inácio Thomaz Bueno, Álvaro Luís Pasquetti Berghetti, Letícia Maria Sella Marques Dias, Pasi Raumonen, Rebecca Araújo GARCIA, Thainá Aloisio Saraiva, Lucas Soares Miguez, Thaís Chaves Almeida, Carlos Roberto Sanquetta, Carla Talita Pertille, Alexandre Behling, Fabiano Rodrigues Pereira, Lucas Bielak Rezende, Carolina Pulido Arce, Alan Sulato de Andrade, Lina Mayra Reis Galvão, Natiele Caumo Mezacasa, Lucca Ferraz Bueno, Mateus dos Santos Neves
article en

Abstract

Belowground biomass (BGB) is an important component of forest carbon stocks but remains poorly quantified owing to the difficulty of measuring it directly. This study evaluated terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) combined with quantitative structure models (QSM) to estimate root volume, biomass and carbon in Pinus taeda. Twelve root systems were excavated, washed, weighed and scanned, then reconstructed using a TreeQSM formulation adapted for stump-root systems. Volume was converted to biomass using mean and diameter class-specific basic density, and to carbon using measured carbon contents. QSM-derived volume showed weak-to-moderate agreement with measured volume (A = 0.6292; CC1 = 0.3916; d = 0.6692), with a systematic underestimation of 43.6%. BGB estimates using mean density showed comparable agreement (A = 0.7339; bias 37.9%), while diameter class-specific densities slightly reduced it (A = 0.7126; bias 40.7%). Basic density was lowest in the finest and highest in the coarsest class (0.224–0.298 g·cm−3), whereas carbon content varied only slightly among classes (43.73–44.62%). Belowground carbon showed agreement comparable to BGB and higher than volume (A = 0.7093–0.7308; bias 37.9–40.7%), with no gain from class-specific carbon contents. A single mean density was sufficient to estimate BGB. This simplification is appropriate as long as the error in volume estimation is greater than the error introduced by using a mean density, but this may change as reconstruction methods improve. In addition, the method requires root systems to be excavated and does not allow the assessment of roots in situ.

ForestsVol. 17(10)
Tampere University (FI), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Tree Root and Stability Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.