Decarceration in US States, 2010–2024: Inertia and Disruption

In 2010, the total US incarceration rate declined for the first time in more than four decades, led by reductions in state prison populations. This review examines decarceration from 2010 to 2024 and the emerging literature that seeks to explain it. We unpack the contours of state-level changes in prison populations and incarceration rates, highlighting the persistence of deep regional differences that characterize punishment in US states and decarceration's uneven impact on certain groups. We discuss the types of policy levers that states have used as prison populations have declined. After briefly reviewing an explanatory framework for mass incarceration, we integrate findings from our case studies of six states and other scholarly research on the forces that have sustained mass incarceration's inertia and disrupted the penal status quo and high levels of imprisonment. In addition to proposing new research questions, we conclude by suggesting that some US states may no longer fit comfortably within the category of mass incarceration and may be better understood as entering a period of penal hybridization where new decarcerative possibilities have begun to disrupt older penal logics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Criminology
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-061026-033548
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Decarceration in US States, 2010–2024: Inertia and Disruption

Heather Schoenfeld, Michael C. Campbell
Annual Review of Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Decarceration in US States, 2010–2024: Inertia and Disruption

Heather Schoenfeld, Michael C. Campbell
article en

Abstract

In 2010, the total US incarceration rate declined for the first time in more than four decades, led by reductions in state prison populations. This review examines decarceration from 2010 to 2024 and the emerging literature that seeks to explain it. We unpack the contours of state-level changes in prison populations and incarceration rates, highlighting the persistence of deep regional differences that characterize punishment in US states and decarceration's uneven impact on certain groups. We discuss the types of policy levers that states have used as prison populations have declined. After briefly reviewing an explanatory framework for mass incarceration, we integrate findings from our case studies of six states and other scholarly research on the forces that have sustained mass incarceration's inertia and disrupted the penal status quo and high levels of imprisonment. In addition to proposing new research questions, we conclude by suggesting that some US states may no longer fit comfortably within the category of mass incarceration and may be better understood as entering a period of penal hybridization where new decarcerative possibilities have begun to disrupt older penal logics.

Annual Review of Criminology
Boston University (US), University of Denver (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decarceration in US States, 2010–2024: Inertia and Disruption — Heather Schoenfeld, Michael C. Campbell · Annual Review of Criminology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS